Re: [Xen-devel] PVH dom0 construction timeout

2020-03-02 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 02/03/2020 12:19, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 11:45:26AM +, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> On 28/02/2020 21:08, Andrew Cooper wrote: >>> It turns out that PVH dom0 construction doesn't work so well on a >>> 2-socket Rome system... >> With the softirq fix in place, here are the

Re: [Xen-devel] PVH dom0 construction timeout

2020-03-02 Thread Roger Pau Monné
On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 11:45:26AM +, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 28/02/2020 21:08, Andrew Cooper wrote: > > It turns out that PVH dom0 construction doesn't work so well on a > > 2-socket Rome system... > > With the softirq fix in place, here are the differences in construction > between PV and

Re: [Xen-devel] PVH dom0 construction timeout

2020-03-02 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 28/02/2020 21:08, Andrew Cooper wrote: > It turns out that PVH dom0 construction doesn't work so well on a > 2-socket Rome system... With the softirq fix in place, here are the differences in construction between PV and PVH along with timestamps. (XEN) [   30.856178] NX (Execute Disable) prote

Re: [Xen-devel] PVH dom0 construction timeout

2020-03-02 Thread Roger Pau Monné
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 09:08:30PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote: > It turns out that PVH dom0 construction doesn't work so well on a > 2-socket Rome system... > > (XEN) NX (Execute Disable) protection active > > (XEN) *** Building a PVH Dom0 *** > > (XEN) Watchdog timer detects that CPU0 is stuck!

Re: [Xen-devel] PVH dom0 construction timeout

2020-03-02 Thread Jan Beulich
On 02.03.2020 10:24, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 28.02.2020 22:08, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> page_get_ram_type() is definitely suboptimal here.  We have an linear >> search over a (large-ish) sorted list, and a caller which has every MFN >> in the system passed into it, which makes the total runtime of >

Re: [Xen-devel] PVH dom0 construction timeout

2020-03-02 Thread Jan Beulich
On 28.02.2020 22:08, Andrew Cooper wrote: > It turns out that PVH dom0 construction doesn't work so well on a > 2-socket Rome system... > > (XEN) NX (Execute Disable) protection active > > (XEN) *** Building a PVH Dom0 *** > > (XEN) Watchdog timer detects that CPU0 is stuck! > > (XEN) [ Xen

[Xen-devel] PVH dom0 construction timeout

2020-02-28 Thread Andrew Cooper
It turns out that PVH dom0 construction doesn't work so well on a 2-socket Rome system... (XEN) NX (Execute Disable) protection active (XEN) *** Building a PVH Dom0 *** (XEN) Watchdog timer detects that CPU0 is stuck! (XEN) [ Xen-4.14-unstable  x86_64  debug=y   Not tainted ] (XEN) CPU