On 07/12/2023 12:44, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 07.12.2023 12:48, Federico Serafini wrote:
On 07/12/23 12:43, Federico Serafini wrote:
Hello everyone,
Rule 5.6 states that a typedef name shall be a unique identifier.
This is to avoid developer confusion.
For ARM, the violations left [1] are gen
On 07.12.2023 12:48, Federico Serafini wrote:
> On 07/12/23 12:43, Federico Serafini wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> Rule 5.6 states that a typedef name shall be a unique identifier.
>> This is to avoid developer confusion.
>>
>> For ARM, the violations left [1] are generated by two definitions
>>
On 07/12/23 12:43, Federico Serafini wrote:
Hello everyone,
Rule 5.6 states that a typedef name shall be a unique identifier.
This is to avoid developer confusion.
For ARM, the violations left [1] are generated by two definitions
of the type phys_addr_t within two different files.
I would like
