Re: Community Process Group - Proposal

2024-01-29 Thread Kelly Choi
Thank you everyone for your feedback so far. I will be sending out a formal vote to committers this week on this proposal. Once I receive the results I will announce to xen-devel the next steps or if any further changes are needed. Many thanks, Kelly Choi Community Manager Xen Project On

Re: Community Process Group - Proposal

2024-01-24 Thread David Woodhouse
On Tue, 2024-01-23 at 08:34 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 22.01.2024 23:47, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > On Mon, 22 Jan 2024, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > What definitely needs clarifying is what "review" is: Are R-b tags > > > counted, or is it the number of replies sent commenting on patches? > >

Re: Community Process Group - Proposal

2024-01-24 Thread Kelly Choi
- AB Hi Jan, Please see my reply to the points below Many thanks, Kelly Choi Community Manager Xen Project On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 10:32 AM Jan Beulich wrote: > On 17.01.2024 18:10, Kelly Choi wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > I've spent a bit of time talking to various individuals and the

Re: Community Process Group - Proposal

2024-01-23 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Tue, 23 Jan 2024, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 22.01.2024 23:47, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > On Mon, 22 Jan 2024, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> What definitely needs clarifying is what "review" is: Are R-b tags > >> counted, or is it the number of replies sent commenting on patches? > > > > Yes, I

Re: Community Process Group - Proposal

2024-01-22 Thread Jan Beulich
On 22.01.2024 23:47, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Mon, 22 Jan 2024, Jan Beulich wrote: >> What definitely needs clarifying is what "review" is: Are R-b tags >> counted, or is it the number of replies sent commenting on patches? > > Yes, I think this needs to be clarified. I would say

Re: Community Process Group - Proposal

2024-01-22 Thread Stefano Stabellini
I am only addressing a couple of Jan's points below. On Mon, 22 Jan 2024, Jan Beulich wrote: > > A CPG will be your second point of call, where you can escalate matters > > quickly for a democratic solution. > > Between informal voting and this "second point of call", where does > formal voting

Re: Community Process Group - Proposal

2024-01-22 Thread Jan Beulich
On 17.01.2024 18:10, Kelly Choi wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I've spent a bit of time talking to various individuals and the advisory > board about setting up a new Community Process Group. > > A survey was recently conducted to identify how the community as a whole > feels about a certain

Re: Community Process Group - Proposal

2024-01-22 Thread Jan Beulich
On 19.01.2024 17:37, Kelly Choi wrote: > On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 10:09 AM Yann Dirson wrote: >> On 1/17/24 18:10, Kelly Choi wrote: >>> A survey was recently conducted to identify how the community as a whole >>> feels about a certain situation. It was not intended to ban specific >>> wording or

Re: Community Process Group - Proposal

2024-01-19 Thread Kelly Choi
Hi Yann, See my reply below On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 10:09 AM Yann Dirson wrote: > Hi all, > > On 1/17/24 18:10, Kelly Choi wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > I've spent a bit of time talking to various individuals and the advisory > > board about setting up a new Community Process Group. > > > >

Re: Community Process Group - Proposal

2024-01-18 Thread Yann Dirson
Hi all, On 1/17/24 18:10, Kelly Choi wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I've spent a bit of time talking to various individuals and the advisory > board about setting up a new Community Process Group. > > A survey was recently conducted to identify how the community as a whole > feels about a certain

Community Process Group - Proposal

2024-01-17 Thread Kelly Choi
Hi everyone, I've spent a bit of time talking to various individuals and the advisory board about setting up a new Community Process Group. A survey was recently conducted to identify how the community as a whole feels about a certain situation. It was not intended to ban specific wording or