Re: Nonsensical XSM Flask denial

2022-03-18 Thread Jan Beulich
On 17.03.2022 20:02, Jason Andryuk wrote: > On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 2:14 PM Andrew Cooper > wrote: >> >> On 17/03/2022 17:52, Jason Andryuk wrote: >>> I shut down a domU (HVM dom9 w/ Linux stubdom dom10) with a single PCI >>> device assigned. Xen logged the following Flask denial for a second

Re: Nonsensical XSM Flask denial

2022-03-17 Thread Jason Andryuk
On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 2:14 PM Andrew Cooper wrote: > > On 17/03/2022 17:52, Jason Andryuk wrote: > > I shut down a domU (HVM dom9 w/ Linux stubdom dom10) with a single PCI > > device assigned. Xen logged the following Flask denial for a second > > PVH dom5 (uivm) without any PCI devices

Re: Nonsensical XSM Flask denial

2022-03-17 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 17/03/2022 17:52, Jason Andryuk wrote: > I shut down a domU (HVM dom9 w/ Linux stubdom dom10) with a single PCI > device assigned. Xen logged the following Flask denial for a second > PVH dom5 (uivm) without any PCI devices assigned. This is Xen 4.14.4. > > (XEN) avc: denied { remove_irq }

Nonsensical XSM Flask denial

2022-03-17 Thread Jason Andryuk
I shut down a domU (HVM dom9 w/ Linux stubdom dom10) with a single PCI device assigned. Xen logged the following Flask denial for a second PVH dom5 (uivm) without any PCI devices assigned. This is Xen 4.14.4. (XEN) avc: denied { remove_irq } for domid=5 irq=17