Ping: [PATCH v3] x86/HVM: more consistently set I/O completion

2020-09-09 Thread Jan Beulich
On 07.09.2020 11:58, Paul Durrant wrote: > With the comment addition... > > Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant With Paul's R-b I'm intending to time out waiting for a VMX maintainer ack early next week. Jan

RE: Ping: [PATCH v3] x86/HVM: more consistently set I/O completion

2020-09-04 Thread Paul Durrant
> -Original Message- > From: Jan Beulich > Sent: 04 September 2020 09:16 > To: Paul Durrant > Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Andrew Cooper > ; Wei Liu ; > Roger Pau Monné ; Jun Nakajima > ; Kevin Tian > ; George Dunlap > Subject: Ping: [PATCH v3] x8

Ping: [PATCH v3] x86/HVM: more consistently set I/O completion

2020-09-04 Thread Jan Beulich
On 27.08.2020 09:09, Jan Beulich wrote: > Doing this just in hvm_emulate_one_insn() is not enough. > hvm_ud_intercept() and hvm_emulate_one_vm_event() can get invoked for > insns requiring one or more continuations, and at least in principle > hvm_emulate_one_mmio() could, too. Without proper