On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 12:07 PM Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> On 17.03.2022 16:59, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 11:06 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>
> >> On 17.03.2022 15:43, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 9:56 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 10.03.2022 19:44, T
On 17.03.2022 16:59, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 11:06 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
>>
>> On 17.03.2022 15:43, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 9:56 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
On 10.03.2022 19:44, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
> @@ -1155,6 +1154,8 @@ static int cf_che
On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 11:06 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> On 17.03.2022 15:43, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 9:56 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> On 10.03.2022 19:44, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
> >>> @@ -1155,6 +1154,8 @@ static int cf_check hvm_load_cpu_ctxt(struct domain
> >>> *d, hv
On 17.03.2022 15:43, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 9:56 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 10.03.2022 19:44, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
>>> @@ -1155,6 +1154,8 @@ static int cf_check hvm_load_cpu_ctxt(struct domain
>>> *d, hvm_domain_context_t *h)
>>> v->arch.dr6 = ctxt.dr6;
>>>
On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 9:56 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> On 10.03.2022 19:44, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
> > During VM fork resetting a failed vmentry has been observed when the reset
> > is performed immediately after a STI instruction executed. This is due to
> > the guest interruptibility state in th
On 17.03.2022 12:06, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
> Another question I would be interested to hear from the maintainers is in
> regards to the hvm context compat macros. Right now they differentiate
> between hvm hw cpu struct versions based on size. So since this patch
> doesn't change the size how is t
On 10.03.2022 19:44, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
> During VM fork resetting a failed vmentry has been observed when the reset
> is performed immediately after a STI instruction executed. This is due to
> the guest interruptibility state in the VMCS being modified by STI but the
> subsequent reset remove
On Thu, Mar 17, 2022, 2:09 AM Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > From: Tamas K Lengyel
> > Sent: Monday, March 14, 2022 8:14 PM
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 3:22 AM Tian, Kevin
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > From: Lengyel, Tamas
> > > > Sent: Friday, March 11, 2022 2:45 AM
> > > >
> > > > During VM fork resett
> From: Tamas K Lengyel
> Sent: Monday, March 14, 2022 8:14 PM
>
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 3:22 AM Tian, Kevin wrote:
> >
> > > From: Lengyel, Tamas
> > > Sent: Friday, March 11, 2022 2:45 AM
> > >
> > > During VM fork resetting a failed vmentry has been observed when the
> reset
> > > is perfo
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 3:22 AM Tian, Kevin wrote:
>
> > From: Lengyel, Tamas
> > Sent: Friday, March 11, 2022 2:45 AM
> >
> > During VM fork resetting a failed vmentry has been observed when the reset
> > is performed immediately after a STI instruction executed. This is due to
> > the guest int
> From: Lengyel, Tamas
> Sent: Friday, March 11, 2022 2:45 AM
>
> During VM fork resetting a failed vmentry has been observed when the reset
> is performed immediately after a STI instruction executed. This is due to
> the guest interruptibility state in the VMCS being modified by STI but the
> s
11 matches
Mail list logo
