Re: [PATCH v12 24/37] x86/idtentry: Incorporate definitions/declarations of the FRED entries

2023-11-28 Thread Borislav Petkov
On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 10:58:50AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > >You have a very good sense 😊 I've been reading code of a couple of people for a couple of years. :-) > Remember that Signed-off-by: relates to the *patch flow*. Yes, you should take the time to read Documentation/process/ and esp

RE: [PATCH v12 24/37] x86/idtentry: Incorporate definitions/declarations of the FRED entries

2023-11-28 Thread H. Peter Anvin
On November 28, 2023 10:39:01 AM PST, "Li, Xin3" wrote: >> > FRED and IDT can share most of the definitions and declarations so >> > that in the majority of cases the actual handler implementation is the >> > same. >> > >> > The differences are the exceptions where FRED stores exception related >>

RE: [PATCH v12 24/37] x86/idtentry: Incorporate definitions/declarations of the FRED entries

2023-11-28 Thread Li, Xin3
> > FRED and IDT can share most of the definitions and declarations so > > that in the majority of cases the actual handler implementation is the > > same. > > > > The differences are the exceptions where FRED stores exception related > > information on the stack and the sysvec implementations as F

Re: [PATCH v12 24/37] x86/idtentry: Incorporate definitions/declarations of the FRED entries

2023-11-28 Thread Borislav Petkov
On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 11:24:45PM -0700, Xin Li wrote: > FRED and IDT can share most of the definitions and declarations so > that in the majority of cases the actual handler implementation is the > same. > > The differences are the exceptions where FRED stores exception related > information on