On 9/22/20 11:27 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 11:24:20AM -0400, boris.ostrov...@oracle.com wrote:
>> On 9/22/20 10:58 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 04:44:10PM -0400, boris.ostrov...@oracle.com wrote:
This will end up incrementing area->pte
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 11:24:20AM -0400, boris.ostrov...@oracle.com wrote:
>
> On 9/22/20 10:58 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 04:44:10PM -0400, boris.ostrov...@oracle.com wrote:
> >> This will end up incrementing area->ptes pointer. So perhaps something like
> >>
> >>
>
On 9/22/20 10:58 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 04:44:10PM -0400, boris.ostrov...@oracle.com wrote:
>> This will end up incrementing area->ptes pointer. So perhaps something like
>>
>>
>> pte_t **ptes = area->ptes;
>>
>> if (apply_to_page_range(&init_mm, (unsigned long)are
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 04:44:10PM -0400, boris.ostrov...@oracle.com wrote:
> This will end up incrementing area->ptes pointer. So perhaps something like
>
>
> pte_t **ptes = area->ptes;
>
> if (apply_to_page_range(&init_mm, (unsigned long)area->area->addr,
> PAGE_SIZE *
On 9/18/20 12:37 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> +static int gnttab_apply(pte_t *pte, unsigned long addr, void *data)
> +{
> + pte_t ***p = data;
> +
> + **p = pte;
> + (*p)++;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int arch_gnttab_valloc(struct gnttab_vm_area *area, unsigned
> nr_f
