On 03.07.20 00:59, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
On 7/1/20 7:06 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
Xen is requiring 64-bit machines today and since Xen 4.14 it can be
built without 32-bit PV guest support. There is no need to carry the
burden of 32-bit PV guest support in the kernel any longer, as new
guests can
On 7/2/20 7:24 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 02/07/2020 23:59, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> On 7/1/20 7:06 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>>
>>> -#ifdef CONFIG_X86_PAE
>>> -static void xen_set_pte_atomic(pte_t *ptep, pte_t pte)
>>> -{
>>> - trace_xen_mmu_set_pte_atomic(ptep, pte);
>>> - __xen_set_pte
On 02/07/2020 23:59, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 7/1/20 7:06 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_X86_PAE
>> -static void xen_set_pte_atomic(pte_t *ptep, pte_t pte)
>> -{
>> -trace_xen_mmu_set_pte_atomic(ptep, pte);
>> -__xen_set_pte(ptep, pte);
>
> Probably not for this series b
On 7/1/20 7:06 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> Xen is requiring 64-bit machines today and since Xen 4.14 it can be
> built without 32-bit PV guest support. There is no need to carry the
> burden of 32-bit PV guest support in the kernel any longer, as new
> guests can be either HVM or PVH, or they can us
On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 7:08 AM Juergen Gross wrote:
>
> Xen is requiring 64-bit machines today and since Xen 4.14 it can be
> built without 32-bit PV guest support. There is no need to carry the
> burden of 32-bit PV guest support in the kernel any longer, as new
> guests can be either HVM or PVH,
