> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Beulich
> Sent: 06 March 2020 12:47
> To: Durrant, Paul
> Cc: pdurr...@amzn.com; xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Andrew Cooper
> ;
> George Dunlap ; Wei Liu ; Roger Pau
> Monné
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] x86 / p2m: remove page_list check in
>
On 06.03.2020 13:50, Durrant, Paul wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Jan Beulich
>> Sent: 06 March 2020 12:47
>> To: Durrant, Paul
>> Cc: pdurr...@amzn.com; xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Andrew Cooper
>> ;
>> George Dunlap ; Wei Liu ; Roger Pau
>> Monné
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3
On 06.03.2020 13:07, Durrant, Paul wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Jan Beulich
>> Sent: 06 March 2020 11:46
>> To: pdurr...@amzn.com
>> Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Durrant, Paul ;
>> Andrew Cooper
>> ; George Dunlap ; Wei
>> Liu ; Roger Pau
>> Monné
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Beulich
> Sent: 06 March 2020 11:46
> To: pdurr...@amzn.com
> Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Durrant, Paul ;
> Andrew Cooper
> ; George Dunlap ; Wei
> Liu ; Roger Pau
> Monné
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] x86 / p2m: remove page_list check in
>
On 05.03.2020 13:45, pdurr...@amzn.com wrote:
> From: Paul Durrant
>
> There does not seem to be any justification for refusing to create the
> domain's p2m table simply because it may have assigned pages.
I think there is: If any such allocation had happened before, how
would it be represented
