Re: Xen data from meta-virtualization layer

2022-02-05 Thread Julien Grall
On 04/02/2022 23:29, Julien Grall wrote: This message is harmless. This is printed because Xen on Arm doesn't hypercall the hypercall to add a PCI device. On Arm, I meant "doesn't need the hypercall...". we don't need it yet (it might be necessary for PCI passthrough) and MSI/MSI-X are han

Re: Xen data from meta-virtualization layer

2022-02-04 Thread Michael Walle
Hi Julien, Am 2022-02-05 00:29, schrieb Julien Grall: [..] But not a very user friendly one, though. I guess the first UART is disabled/removed by Xen? I haven't looked at how it is handled. Can't we search for other uarts with the same interrupt and disable these, too? Maybe conditionally by t

Re: Xen data from meta-virtualization layer

2022-02-04 Thread Julien Grall
Hi Michael, On Fri, 4 Feb 2022 at 22:42, Michael Walle wrote: > Am 2022-02-04 22:11, schrieb Stefano Stabellini: > > On Fri, 4 Feb 2022, Michael Walle wrote: > >> > In regards to the reserved-memory regions, maybe we are not seeing them > >> > because Leo posted the host device tree, not the one

Re: Xen data from meta-virtualization layer

2022-02-04 Thread Michael Walle
Hi Stefano, Am 2022-02-04 22:11, schrieb Stefano Stabellini: On Fri, 4 Feb 2022, Michael Walle wrote: > In regards to the reserved-memory regions, maybe we are not seeing them > because Leo posted the host device tree, not the one passed at runtime > from u-boot to Linux? > > If so, Leo, could

Re: Xen data from meta-virtualization layer

2022-02-04 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Fri, 4 Feb 2022, Michael Walle wrote: > > In regards to the reserved-memory regions, maybe we are not seeing them > > because Leo posted the host device tree, not the one passed at runtime > > from u-boot to Linux? > > > > If so, Leo, could you please boot Linux on native (no Xen) and get the >

Re: Xen data from meta-virtualization layer

2022-02-04 Thread Michael Walle
Hi all, > + Zhiqiang Hou > > On Tue, 24 Nov 2020, Leo Krueger wrote: > > > >>> On Tue, 17 Nov 2020, Leo Krueger wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I enabled CONFIG_HAS_ITS (what a stupid mistake by me to not set it > > > before...) but then had to add the following node to my device

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: Xen data from meta-virtualization layer

2020-11-24 Thread Stefano Stabellini
+ Zhiqiang Hou On Tue, 24 Nov 2020, Leo Krueger wrote: > > >>> On Tue, 17 Nov 2020, Leo Krueger wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I enabled CONFIG_HAS_ITS (what a stupid mistake by me to not set it > > before...) but then had to add the following node to my device tree > > > >

AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: Xen data from meta-virtualization layer

2020-11-24 Thread Leo Krueger
oject.org; bertrand.marq...@arm.com > Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: Xen data from meta-virtualization layer > > > > On 22/11/2020 22:55, Leo Krueger wrote: > > Hi Julien, > > Hi Leo, > > > > > finally I could try out what you suggested,

AW: Xen data from meta-virtualization layer

2020-11-23 Thread Leo Krueger
e...@epam.com; xen- > de...@lists.xenproject.org; Bertrand Marquis > > Betreff: Re: Xen data from meta-virtualization layer > > > > On 23/11/2020 11:41, Rahul Singh wrote: > > Hello , > > Hi Rahul, > > >> On 22 Nov 2020, at 10:55 pm, Leo Krueger wrote:

Re: Xen data from meta-virtualization layer

2020-11-23 Thread Julien Grall
On 23/11/2020 11:41, Rahul Singh wrote: Hello , Hi Rahul, On 22 Nov 2020, at 10:55 pm, Leo Krueger wrote: root@kontron-sal28:~# ip link set up dev gbe0 (XEN) vgic-v3-its.c:902:d0v0 vITS cmd 0x0c: 0017000c 0001 (XEN) vgic-v3-its.c:902

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: Xen data from meta-virtualization layer

2020-11-23 Thread Julien Grall
Stabellini ; Leo Krueger Cc: Peng Fan ; bru...@xilinx.com; Cornelia Bruelhart ; oleksandr_andrushche...@epam.com; xen- de...@lists.xenproject.org; bertrand.marq...@arm.com Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: Xen data from meta-virtualization layer Hi, On 17/11/2020 23:53, Stefano Stabellini wrote: Adding

Re: Xen data from meta-virtualization layer

2020-11-23 Thread Rahul Singh
3:24 >> An: Stefano Stabellini ; Leo Krueger >> >> Cc: Peng Fan ; bru...@xilinx.com; Cornelia Bruelhart >> ; oleksandr_andrushche...@epam.com; xen- >> de...@lists.xenproject.org; bertrand.marq...@arm.com >> Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: Xen data from meta-virtua

AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: Xen data from meta-virtualization layer

2020-11-22 Thread Leo Krueger
Cornelia Bruelhart > ; oleksandr_andrushche...@epam.com; xen- > de...@lists.xenproject.org; bertrand.marq...@arm.com > Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: Xen data from meta-virtualization layer > > Hi, > > On 17/11/2020 23:53, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > Adding Bertrand, Olek

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: Xen data from meta-virtualization layer

2020-11-18 Thread Julien Grall
Hi, On 17/11/2020 23:53, Stefano Stabellini wrote: Adding Bertrand, Oleksandr, Julien, and others -- they have a more recent experience with GICv3 ITS than me and might be able to help. I am attaching the device tree Leo sent a few days ago for reference. Typically when you can set the etherne

Re: Xen data from meta-virtualization layer

2020-11-18 Thread Rahul Singh
urt: Amtsgericht Hamburg HRB 110232 >> Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates / Chairman of the Supervisory Board: StR >> Andreas Rieckhof >> Geschäftsführung / Board of Management: Roland Gerhards >> >> Disclaimer: >> This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged informati

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: Xen data from meta-virtualization layer

2020-11-17 Thread Stefano Stabellini
ail is strictly > forbidden. > > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > > Von: Stefano Stabellini > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. November 2020 01:59 > > An: Leo Krueger > > Cc: Peng Fan ; Stefano Stabellini > > ; bru...@xilinx.com; Cornelia Bruelhart >