Re: vcpumask_to_pcpumask() case study

On 10.06.2024 12:12, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 10/06/2024 8:15 am, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 07.06.2024 14:35, Andrew Cooper wrote: >>> On 03/06/2024 10:19 pm, Jan Beulich wrote: On 01.06.2024 20:50, Andrew Cooper wrote: > One of the followon items I had from the bitops clean-up is this: >>

Re: vcpumask_to_pcpumask() case study

On 10/06/2024 8:15 am, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 07.06.2024 14:35, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> On 03/06/2024 10:19 pm, Jan Beulich wrote: >>> On 01.06.2024 20:50, Andrew Cooper wrote: One of the followon items I had from the bitops clean-up is this: diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/mm.c b/xen/arc

Re: vcpumask_to_pcpumask() case study

On 07.06.2024 14:35, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 03/06/2024 10:19 pm, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 01.06.2024 20:50, Andrew Cooper wrote: >>> One of the followon items I had from the bitops clean-up is this: >>> >>> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/mm.c b/xen/arch/x86/mm.c >>> index 648d6dd475ba..9c3a017606ed 1

Re: vcpumask_to_pcpumask() case study

On 03/06/2024 10:19 pm, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 01.06.2024 20:50, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> One of the followon items I had from the bitops clean-up is this: >> >> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/mm.c b/xen/arch/x86/mm.c >> index 648d6dd475ba..9c3a017606ed 100644 >> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm.c >> +++ b/xen/arc

Re: vcpumask_to_pcpumask() case study

On 01.06.2024 20:50, Andrew Cooper wrote: > One of the followon items I had from the bitops clean-up is this: > > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/mm.c b/xen/arch/x86/mm.c > index 648d6dd475ba..9c3a017606ed 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm.c > @@ -3425,7 +3425,7 @@ static int vcpu

vcpumask_to_pcpumask() case study

One of the followon items I had from the bitops clean-up is this: diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/mm.c b/xen/arch/x86/mm.c index 648d6dd475ba..9c3a017606ed 100644 --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm.c @@ -3425,7 +3425,7 @@ static int vcpumask_to_pcpumask( unsigned int cpu;