On 07/05/2024 16:15, Luca Fancellu wrote:
>
>
> Hi Michal,
>
>
>
> int __init process_shm(struct domain *d, struct kernel_info *kinfo,
> const struct dt_device_node *node)
> {
> @@ -249,32 +290,10 @@ int __init process_shm(struct domain *d, struct
Hi Michal,
int __init process_shm(struct domain *d, struct kernel_info *kinfo,
const struct dt_device_node *node)
{
@@ -249,32 +290,10 @@ int __init process_shm(struct domain *d, struct
kernel_info *kinfo,
if (
On 07/05/2024 15:57, Luca Fancellu wrote:
>
>
> Hi Michal,
>
>>>
>>> +static int __init handle_shared_mem_bank(struct domain *d, paddr_t gbase,
>>> + bool owner_dom_io,
>>> + const char *role_str,
>>> +
Hi Michal,
>>
>> +static int __init handle_shared_mem_bank(struct domain *d, paddr_t gbase,
>> + bool owner_dom_io,
>> + const char *role_str,
>> + const struct membank
Hi Luca,
On 23/04/2024 10:25, Luca Fancellu wrote:
>
>
> Wrap the code and logic that is calling assign_shared_memory
> and map_regions_p2mt into a new function 'handle_shared_mem_bank',
> it will become useful later when the code will allow the user to
> don't pass the host physical address.
>
Wrap the code and logic that is calling assign_shared_memory
and map_regions_p2mt into a new function 'handle_shared_mem_bank',
it will become useful later when the code will allow the user to
don't pass the host physical address.
Signed-off-by: Luca Fancellu
---
xen/arch/arm/static-shmem.c |
