Le Jeudi 25 Mai 2006 04:04, Isaku Yamahata a écrit :
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 04:25:25PM +0200, Tristan Gingold wrote:
diff -r 303e1b6bf727 xen/arch/ia64/Rules.mk
--- a/xen/arch/ia64/Rules.mkSun May 21 07:49:46 2006 -0600
+++ b/xen/arch/ia64/Rules.mkTue May 23 14:44:22 2006
add missing END(xen_bsw1)
--
yamahata
# HG changeset patch
# User [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Node ID fdc4531a8adf9e751a3d84f0eac5d552e776a519
# Parent c073ebdbde8c0f5c9437706b46c4a34f35033c0c
add missing END(xen_bsw1)
PATCHNAME: add_missing_end_xen_bsw1
Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Now xen drivers use is_running_on_xen() to check whether it runs on
xen or bare metal. There remains many if (running_on_xen) in ia64
specific codes. This patch replaces running_on_xen with is_running_on_xen()
--
yamahata
# HG changeset patch
# User [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Node ID
xen-mkbuildtree-pre of ia64 clean up.
evtchn_ia64.c doesn't exist now.
--
yamahata
# HG changeset patch
# User [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Node ID c4d9255bc266bc8ff28475d9b382a04f5ec6811a
# Parent b712049222e6d8d1e578191c3d4facee0cdcef08
xen-mkbuildtree-pre of ia64 clean up.
evtchn_ia64.c doesn't
From: Tristan Gingold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 2006年5月30日 15:57
Since it's a RFC, it's better if, you could give more detail description
about why you need this change and what benefit people can achieve
from. For example:
- Why do you like to kill DOM0_SETVPUCONTEXT, which has
Hi,
most big recent patches (dom0vp, event channel) have broken transparent
virtualization.
Should we give up this feature ?
If only Dan and I like this feature, this question should be clearly asked.
Tristan.
___
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
This patch fixes several minor issues, as a prepare step to support VGA
acceleration for VTI domain:
- shared vram buffer needs to be mapped as WB in both sides, because
the shared vram is the true WB memory though VTI domain is told as UC
- Introduced a new pte_mem to indicate p2m entry
On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 17:18 +0200, Tristan Gingold wrote:
Hi,
most big recent patches (dom0vp, event channel) have broken transparent
virtualization.
Should we give up this feature ?
If only Dan and I like this feature, this question should be clearly asked.
I'm a fan of it too. I
Transparent paravirtualization has little value to developers
or technology providers but definitely has value for distros
and software/system/support providers. Note for example
that Vmware's PVI (for x86) has transparent paravirtualization
because Vmware (the largest provider in the world of
Hi everyone,
I know we're probably not to the point of officially supporting
Xen/ia64 on hardware, but I'd like to get a list of known working
hardware setups to use as reference. So far, I know we have:
Intel Tiger4
HP rx2600/rx1600/rx2620 (and likely any HP zx1 based system)
Bull?
Fujitsu?
On Sat, 2006-05-27 at 10:45 +0800, Xu, Anthony wrote:
Optimize thash vtlb algorithm.
Applied.
--
Alex Williamson HP Open Source Linux Org.
___
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com
Applied.
--
Alex Williamson HP Open Source Linux Org.
___
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 18:56 +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
add missing END(xen_bsw1)
Applied.
--
Alex Williamson HP Open Source Linux Org.
___
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com
On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 18:56 +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
Now xen drivers use is_running_on_xen() to check whether it runs on
xen or bare metal. There remains many if (running_on_xen) in ia64
specific codes. This patch replaces running_on_xen with is_running_on_xen()
Applied.
--
Alex
On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 18:59 +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
xen-mkbuildtree-pre of ia64 clean up.
evtchn_ia64.c doesn't exist now.
Applied.
--
Alex Williamson HP Open Source Linux Org.
___
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Hi Alex,
Fujitsu team has successfully booted Xen/IA64 on
PRIMEQUEST (bigiron type business server).
So far, we did some basic functional tests on that platform,
but plan to do more extensive scalability tests later.
Thanks,
Yoshi Oguchi
--
Alex Williamson wrote:
Hi everyone,
I know we're
This patch intends to fix isr setting before injecting fault to it.
With this small fix, CPU2000 in VTi can pass now.
Thanks
-Xiantao
___
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
Sorry for forgetting the attachment. Patch attached.
Thanks
-Xiantao
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Zhang,
Xiantao
Sent: 2006年5月31日 10:35
To: xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH]set isr before
Fixed an issue which causes VTI-domain complains Oops: time tick before it's
due
Signed-off-by: Anthony Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks,
-Anthony
new_Oops.patch
Description: new_Oops.patch
___
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Add sal emulation to VTI domain
Signed-off-by Anthony.xu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks,
-Anthony
add_sal_emulation.patch
Description: add_sal_emulation.patch
___
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com
20 matches
Mail list logo
