Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] pv_ops: file name

2008-03-31 Thread Isaku Yamahata
I agree with you. For the minimal domU, binary patch isn't needed anymore now so that I removed paravirt_(core|entry).(c|h) completely. After merging up minimal domU stuff to the upstream, let's readd those files with consistent file names (probably into paravirt.c). I also found that the file

[Xen-ia64-devel] pv_ops: file name

2008-03-28 Thread Dong, Eddie
Isaku: When looking at the new files in kernel new directory, I am wondering if we can merge paravirt_core.c code into paravirt.c? The size of them are very small and meaning are similar, also X86 put in one file. Another file is paravirt_entry.c, will paravirt_patch.c be much