RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] pv_ops polish: remove fsys.S changes

2008-03-17 Thread Dong, Eddie
>> Commit a07b265c618c279a84bac8f75f5acba1c1646200 is quit intrusive, >> it removed code from entry.S to a new file switch_entry.S and create >> 1000 lines of patch. >> >> At least we stay in original file, not? > > At least xen/ia64 needs to paravirtualize ia64_swtich_to, I did a scan on Alex

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] pv_ops polish: remove fsys.S changes

2008-03-17 Thread Isaku Yamahata
Hi. I created the new branch xen-ia64-domu-minimal-2008mar06 from the c/s b5d0753da4b1d67490efa63c790024351add42a0. Please switch to the new branch. I suppose the new branch is what you want. It doesn't include any dom0 stuff, fsys.S and gate page stuff. On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 06:16:03PM +0800, D

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] pv_ops polish: remove fsys.S changes

2008-03-14 Thread Dong, Eddie
Isaku Yamahata wrote: > Hi Eddie. > Thank you for your patch. > the change is already isolated as the commit of > d81f732b0d57371bfc220b1a1027ab18ea9a5265. > So what we need to do is just dropping the change set. > The same would apply to the gate page paravirtualization change set. > I'll take car

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] pv_ops polish: remove fsys.S changes

2008-03-14 Thread Isaku Yamahata
Hi Eddie. Thank you for your patch. the change is already isolated as the commit of d81f732b0d57371bfc220b1a1027ab18ea9a5265. So what we need to do is just dropping the change set. The same would apply to the gate page paravirtualization change set. I'll take care of it. Do you have any other chan

[Xen-ia64-devel] pv_ops polish: remove fsys.S changes

2008-03-14 Thread Dong, Eddie
CONFIG_XEN needs to be gradually removed per discussion since pv_ops include this concept. Due to this, we defer the fsys.S changes for some time later to use indirect function call. Temporay undo it for now. Thanks, eddie commit a882270f415e717a3694f2762f348ab285fb55ce Author: root <[EMAIL PR