On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 13:53 +0800, Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
> Hi, Alex
> What's your opinion about this cleanup patch ? Thanks
Hi Xiantao,
It looks good to me. I searched through the history to see where
MINSTATE_PHYS was used, and it appears to be a leftover from 2.4
support. We should
Hi, Alex
What's your opinion about this cleanup patch ? Thanks
Xiantao
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Zhang, Xiantao
Sent: 2008年2月2日 10:17
To: Akio Takebe; Dong, Eddie; xen-ia64-devel
Cc: Alex Williamson
Subject: RE: [Xen
Akio Takebe wrote:
> Hi, Xiantao and all
>
>> Akio Takebe wrote:
>>> Hi, Eddie and Kaz
>>>
I did a quick grep and find MINSTATE_PHYS is never defined in
xenlinux. Xen mca code did. Anything missed?
>>> The minstate.h is a little old, it seems to be around linux-2.6.9.
>>> Current
Hi, Xiantao and all
>Akio Takebe wrote:
>> Hi, Eddie and Kaz
>>
>>> I did a quick grep and find MINSTATE_PHYS is never defined in
>>> xenlinux. Xen mca code did. Anything missed?
>>>
>> The minstate.h is a little old, it seems to be around linux-2.6.9.
>> Current linux-xen is 2.6.18, so the code
Akio Takebe wrote:
> Hi, Eddie and Kaz
>
>> I did a quick grep and find MINSTATE_PHYS is never defined in
>> xenlinux. Xen mca code did. Anything missed?
>>
> The minstate.h is a little old, it seems to be around linux-2.6.9.
> Current linux-xen is 2.6.18, so the code may be not nessesary.
> Kaz,
Hi, Eddie and Kaz
>I did a quick grep and find MINSTATE_PHYS is never defined in xenlinux.
>Xen mca code did. Anything missed?
>
The minstate.h is a little old, it seems to be around linux-2.6.9.
Current linux-xen is 2.6.18, so the code may be not nessesary.
Kaz, do you know about it?
Best Regar
