Maria Butrico/Watson/[EMAIL PROTECTED],
XenPPC-devel
Subject
Re: [XenPP
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 02:11:54AM -0400, Hao Yu wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
> Thanks for the info. I followed your steps and basically got the same
> thing:
Hi Hao,
You're up late (or early).
> 1. I got rid of the line : vif = [ '' ] , created a domain (id=8)
>
> 2. I issued xm network-attach
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 10:38:46AM -0400, Jimi Xenidis wrote:
> this just works in my local disk environment and I'm pretty sure othe
> local disk environments work as well.
> Hollis, Tony are you able to create domain that have net access?
Yes. On my JS20 I was able to create a domU (called t
Hi Tony,
Thanks for the info. I followed your steps and basically got the same
thing:
1. I got rid of the line : vif = [ '' ] , created a domain (id=8)
2. I issued xm network-attach 8, Here is the output
cso83:~ # xm network-attach 8
Error: Device 1 (vif) could not be connected. Backend device
Hi Amos,
We try to bring up domU but could not bring up the network. Below are a few
attachments that give the domU configuration file.
Dilma told us that your environment is more familier to ours than jimi's.
We would need your help to progress on the thread.
Thanks,
Hao
Hao Yu
Commercial Sca
On Oct 25, 2006, at 8:10 AM, Hao Yu wrote:
Jimi,
Thanks to David who put matched xen tools in the xen/linux image,
which
solves the problem of memory configuration.
Thats good.
I still can not set IP address from dhcp. For convenience, I post the
configuration file here (See attached f
Jimi,
Thanks to David who put matched xen tools in the xen/linux image, which
solves the problem of memory configuration.
I still can not set IP address from dhcp. For convenience, I post the
configuration file here (See attached file: hao_edi_config); ifconfig
output of dom0 after 'xend' started
Hao, please use the list.
On Oct 24, 2006, at 12:22 PM, Hao Yu wrote:
Jimi,
Thanks for helping us successfully creating domU. Just to summarize
so we
can continue after 2pm today, here are 2 issues we are facing:
1. we encountered problem specifying memory more than 512 MB
when we spec