Re: [Xenomai] Peak PCI CAN card RTCAN problem

2012-06-23 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
On 06/23/2012 04:24 PM, Kronander Klas wrote: > Hi, > > I have an installation of ubuntu 12.04 with xenomai 2.5.5.2. Do you have the same issues with xenomai 2.5.6, or even better, xenomai 2.6.0 ? -- Gilles. __

[Xenomai] Peak PCI CAN card RTCAN problem

2012-06-23 Thread Kronander Klas
Hi, I have an installation of ubuntu 12.04 with xenomai 2.5.5.2. This PC is used to communicate with a robot over CAN bus. The CAN card installed on the PC is a dual channel PCI card from PEAK Systems. I have not been able to use the CAN port at all so far. The device is detected by the system

Re: [Xenomai] How to fix error "incompatible ABI revision levels on Ubuntu Linux 3.6.38 on ARM?

2012-06-23 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
On 06/23/2012 01:25 PM, AKS wrote: > Hi Gilles > > Thanks for the reply. Does that latest and greatest Xenomai 2.6 support ARM? Yes, ARM is supported and actively maintained. -- Gilles.

Re: [Xenomai] How to fix error "incompatible ABI revision levels on Ubuntu Linux 3.6.38 on ARM?

2012-06-23 Thread AKS
Hi Gilles Thanks for the reply. Does that latest and greatest Xenomai 2.6 support ARM? On 6/23/12, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > On 06/23/2012 12:31 PM, AKS wrote: >> Hi >> >> I am trying to use Xenomai after patching 2.6.rc5 onto Linux 2.6.38 >> kernel > > This version is outdated, you should u

Re: [Xenomai] How to fix error "incompatible ABI revision levels on Ubuntu Linux 3.6.38 on ARM?

2012-06-23 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
On 06/23/2012 12:31 PM, AKS wrote: > Hi > > I am trying to use Xenomai after patching 2.6.rc5 onto Linux 2.6.38 kernel This version is outdated, you should use xenomai 2.6.0 > based on ARM based TI OMAP processor and Ubuntu 11.10 OS. After the > Xenomai patched kernel is booted, I tried to insta

Re: [Xenomai] defconfig.frag !!

2012-06-23 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
On 06/23/2012 10:56 AM, ali hagigat wrote: > I have installed Xenomai 2.6.0 for Linux-2.6.38.8. There are 3 new > files for vxworks: /usr/xenomai/include/vxworks/syscall.h and > /usr/xenomai/include/vxworks/vxworks.h and > /usr/xenomai/include/vxworks/ppd.h. > > Are these header files suffice to

Re: [Xenomai] Xenomai RT user application- POSIX interface

2012-06-23 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
On 06/23/2012 04:28 AM, Mohit Jandwani wrote: > Ok I got it figured out..but one thing where I am still stuck is- > does using files like string.h(functions like memcpy memset) which are in > the glibc make system calls? > (cause from porting POSIX to xenomai i think they don't). You got it right.

[Xenomai] How to fix error "incompatible ABI revision levels on Ubuntu Linux 3.6.38 on ARM?

2012-06-23 Thread AKS
Hi I am trying to use Xenomai after patching 2.6.rc5 onto Linux 2.6.38 kernel based on ARM based TI OMAP processor and Ubuntu 11.10 OS. After the Xenomai patched kernel is booted, I tried to install Xenomai using the apt utility by sudo apt-get install xenomai-runtime. However, when I tried to run

Re: [Xenomai] some questions about the architecture of Xenomai

2012-06-23 Thread Philippe Gerum
On 06/23/2012 11:46 AM, ali hagigat wrote: 1) Does (ADEOS and) Xenomai project changes and extends the Linux kernel sys_call_table? Strictly speaking, no. They extend the syscall namespace by interposing on the linux syscall mechanism, without altering the original table. 2) Considering i

[Xenomai] some questions about the architecture of Xenomai

2012-06-23 Thread ali hagigat
1) Does (ADEOS and) Xenomai project changes and extends the Linux kernel sys_call_table? 2) Considering i have used a VxWorks API function, will it be translated to a new Linux kernel system call? If no, why there are some emulators and interfaces for VxWorks, pSOS and so on inside kernel? 3) Does

[Xenomai] defconfig.frag !!

2012-06-23 Thread ali hagigat
I have installed Xenomai 2.6.0 for Linux-2.6.38.8. There are 3 new files for vxworks: /usr/xenomai/include/vxworks/syscall.h and /usr/xenomai/include/vxworks/vxworks.h and /usr/xenomai/include/vxworks/ppd.h. Are these header files suffice to use the whole capabilities of VxWorks operating system?