On 10/23/2013 11:42 PM, Chiara wrote:
> Hi Gilles,
> I tried latency test and xeno-test..
> I would compare my histogram with yours but I think that our parameters are
> different..
> In my histogram the scale of the user space latency arrives on 300
> microseconds and the difference between the
>
> Ok, I can't reproduce with this code yet. Let's proceed differently.
> Could you apply the patch below, then send back the kernel output
> you should get when the issue happens? The traces are emitted only when
> a task self-suspends using a null tid, which should restrict the scope
> enough to
Hi Gilles,
I tried latency test and xeno-test..
I would compare my histogram with yours but I think that our parameters are
different..
In my histogram the scale of the user space latency arrives on 300 microseconds
and the difference between the values is 50 microseconds, while your's 5..could
On 10/23/2013 12:10 AM, Daniel Merrill wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Philippe Gerum [mailto:r...@xenomai.org]
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 9:53 AM
>> To: Gilles Chanteperdrix
>> Cc: Daniel Merrill; xenomai@xenomai.org
>> Subject: Re: [Xenomai] t_suspend and XNBREAK
>>
>>
On 10/23/2013 02:40 PM, ali hagigat wrote:
> I have installed xenomai-2.6.2.1 under Fedora 13, kernel: 3.5.7, CPU:
> Intel, core to quad, 2.4GHZ, machine: i686, 32 bits
Are you able to reproduce these issues with Xenomai latest version?
--
return
value is (-3), it is not -EINVAL, or -EIDRM!!
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: examp2.c
Type: text/x-csrc
Size: 4432 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://www.xenomai.org/pipermail/xenomai/attachments/20131023/52cb4405/attachment.c>
