Re: [Xenomai] t_suspend and XNBREAK

2013-10-24 Thread Daniel Merrill
> > - Do you handle SIG32 specifically in GDB, so that the > latter does not intercept the signal? If not, could you check whether > this makes any difference? (i.e. "handle SIG32 nostop noprint pass") > > - Could you apply the patch below, keeping the previous one in? > We should be sending back

Re: [Xenomai] xsave/xrstor compilation error

2013-10-24 Thread Jan Kiszka
On 2013-10-24 17:40, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2013-10-24 16:48, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >> On 10/24/2013 12:06 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> We >>> can, of course, replace the instructions with their obcodes (like the >>> kernel does), just makes the code more ugly. >> >> Jan, please do this, even if

Re: [Xenomai] xsave/xrstor compilation error

2013-10-24 Thread Jan Kiszka
On 2013-10-24 16:48, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > On 10/24/2013 12:06 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> We >> can, of course, replace the instructions with their obcodes (like the >> kernel does), just makes the code more ugly. > > Jan, please do this, even if it makes the code more ugly, it makes sense >

Re: [Xenomai] t_suspend and XNBREAK

2013-10-24 Thread Daniel Merrill
> -Original Message- > From: Philippe Gerum [mailto:r...@xenomai.org] > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2013 3:03 AM > To: Daniel Merrill; 'Gilles Chanteperdrix' > Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org > Subject: Re: [Xenomai] t_suspend and XNBREAK > > On 10/24/2013 01:11 AM, Daniel Merrill wrote: > >> > >

Re: [Xenomai] xsave/xrstor compilation error

2013-10-24 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
On 10/24/2013 12:06 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: We can, of course, replace the instructions with their obcodes (like the kernel does), just makes the code more ugly. Jan, please do this, even if it makes the code more ugly, it makes sense for the 2.6.3 release to continue working with the tools it a

Re: [Xenomai] xsave/xrstor compilation error

2013-10-24 Thread Jan Kiszka
On 2013-10-24 09:40, Jean-Baptiste Tredez wrote: > Hi, > > I tried to upgrade to xenomai 2.6.3 and compilation failed with : > > linux-2.6.38.8/arch/x86/include/asm/xenomai/bits/pod.h: Assembler messages: > linux-2.6.38.8/arch/x86/include/asm/xenomai/bits/pod.h:305: Error: no > such instruction:

Re: [Xenomai] t_suspend and XNBREAK

2013-10-24 Thread Philippe Gerum
On 10/24/2013 01:11 AM, Daniel Merrill wrote: >> >> Ok, I can't reproduce with this code yet. Let's proceed differently. >> Could you apply the patch below, then send back the kernel output >> you should get when the issue happens? The traces are emitted only when >> a task self-suspends using a nu

Re: [Xenomai] [PATCH 0 of 3] Xenomai-forge: Initial implementation of registry for pSOS

2013-10-24 Thread Philippe Gerum
On 10/24/2013 10:28 AM, Kim De Mey wrote: 2013/10/22 Kim De Mey mailto:kim.de...@gmail.com>> 2013/10/22 Philippe Gerum mailto:r...@xenomai.org>> On 10/22/2013 06:45 PM, Kim De Mey wrote: 2013/10/19 Ronny Meeus mailto:ronny.me...@gmail.com>

[Xenomai] xsave/xrstor compilation error

2013-10-24 Thread Jean-Baptiste Tredez
Hi, I tried to upgrade to xenomai 2.6.3 and compilation failed with : linux-2.6.38.8/arch/x86/include/asm/xenomai/bits/pod.h: Assembler messages: linux-2.6.38.8/arch/x86/include/asm/xenomai/bits/pod.h:305: Error: no such instruction: `xrstor (%ebx)' linux-2.6.38.8/arch/x86/include/asm/xenomai/b

Re: [Xenomai] [PATCH 0 of 3] Xenomai-forge: Initial implementation of registry for pSOS

2013-10-24 Thread Kim De Mey
2013/10/22 Kim De Mey > > > > 2013/10/22 Philippe Gerum > >> On 10/22/2013 06:45 PM, Kim De Mey wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> 2013/10/19 Ronny Meeus >> **> >>> >>> >>> >>> IIUC, this would add the quite unexpected requirement of having >>> to reopen a fi

Re: [Xenomai] Help with the histogram of latency test

2013-10-24 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
On 10/24/2013 09:01 AM, Chiara Capretti wrote: >> Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 08:29:23 +0200 >> From: gilles.chanteperd...@xenomai.org >> To: chiaracapre...@hotmail.it >> CC: xenomai@xenomai.org >> Subject: Re: [Xenomai] Help with the histogram of latency test >> >> On 10/23/2013 11:42 PM, Chiara wrote:

Re: [Xenomai] Help with the histogram of latency test

2013-10-24 Thread Chiara Capretti
I'm running the test on an X86.. Intel core i7, 2.9 GHz. I installed Ubuntu and Xenomai on a virtual machine. > Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 08:29:23 +0200 > From: gilles.chanteperd...@xenomai.org > To: chiaracapre...@hotmail.it > CC: xenomai@xenomai.org > Subject: Re: [Xenomai] Help with the histogram