Re: [Xenomai] Issue suspending threads on mercury

2014-03-17 Thread Kim De Mey
2014-03-16 22:07 GMT+01:00 Matthias Schneider ma30002...@yahoo.de: On Sunday, March 16, 2014 9:12 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix gilles.chanteperd...@xenomai.org wrote: On 03/16/2014 08:09 PM, Matthias Schneider wrote: Hi all, I am experiencing a problem with xenomai-forge (recent next

[Xenomai] xenomai 2.6.3 build failure on armhf

2014-03-17 Thread Lennart Sorensen
I saw armhf had been added to debian/control in the xenomai-2.6 tree, and since I am trying to get it running there I figured it was worth pulling that version. Unfortunately it fails to build with the same error as 2.6.3 does. So any idea what this error means: assert_context.c: In function

Re: [Xenomai] xenomai 2.6.3 build failure on armhf

2014-03-17 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
On 03/17/2014 04:59 PM, Lennart Sorensen wrote: I saw armhf had been added to debian/control in the xenomai-2.6 tree, and since I am trying to get it running there I figured it was worth pulling that version. Unfortunately it fails to build with the same error as 2.6.3 does. So any idea what

Re: [Xenomai] xenomai 2.6.3 build failure on armhf

2014-03-17 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 05:10:16PM +0100, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: On 03/17/2014 04:59 PM, Lennart Sorensen wrote: I saw armhf had been added to debian/control in the xenomai-2.6 tree, and since I am trying to get it running there I figured it was worth pulling that version. Unfortunately

Re: [Xenomai] xenomai 2.6.3 build failure on armhf

2014-03-17 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
On 03/17/2014 05:27 PM, Lennart Sorensen wrote: On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 05:10:16PM +0100, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: On 03/17/2014 04:59 PM, Lennart Sorensen wrote: I saw armhf had been added to debian/control in the xenomai-2.6 tree, and since I am trying to get it running there I figured it

Re: [Xenomai] xenomai 2.6.3 build failure on armhf

2014-03-17 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 05:30:19PM +0100, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: On 03/17/2014 05:27 PM, Lennart Sorensen wrote: Hmm, so Debian's version of debian/rules has this: # necessary from GCC 4.6 on CFLAGS += -fno-omit-frame-pointer I wonder if they are wrong. Here we maintain our

Re: [Xenomai] xenomai 2.6.3 build failure on armhf

2014-03-17 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
On 03/17/2014 05:34 PM, Lennart Sorensen wrote: On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 05:30:19PM +0100, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: On 03/17/2014 05:27 PM, Lennart Sorensen wrote: Hmm, so Debian's version of debian/rules has this: # necessary from GCC 4.6 on CFLAGS += -fno-omit-frame-pointer I wonder if

Re: [Xenomai] Issue suspending threads on mercury

2014-03-17 Thread Matthias Schneider
On Monday, March 17, 2014 9:12 AM, Philippe Gerum r...@xenomai.org wrote: On 03/16/2014 08:09 PM, Matthias Schneider wrote:   Hi all,   I am experiencing a problem with xenomai-forge (recent next checkout) on   Mercury (on top of a 3.12.9+CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT on x86) when suspending  

[Xenomai] header file order in copperplate/registry.c

2014-03-17 Thread Matthias Schneider
Hi all, shouldn't fuse.h be include after xeno_config.h in copperplate/registry.c  of xenomai-forge/next in order to allow xeno_config.h to set the FUSE_USE_VERSION define before it is set to a default value by fuse.h? Otherwise I get compile errors due to mismatching APIs. Regards, Matthias

[Xenomai] ipipe-3.0-imx6q

2014-03-17 Thread Laci Tele
Hi Gilles, In your ipipe git repo (ipipe-gch.git) there is a branch named ipipe-3.0-imx6q . I cloned the repo and checked that branch out. Its a 3.0.43 kernel. And this is what I don't understand. Is it supposed to be a kernel for Freescale im6q boards? Because Freescale's supported kernels are: