On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 08:30:03PM +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 04:04:18PM +0200, Stéphane ANCELOT wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am checking timing issues of realtime rtnet frames in my application.
> > Timing to send a frame is convenient.
> > but I have some issues wi
On 08/24/2015 08:13 PM, Don Mahurin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We would like to submit our current work on the arm64 port of
> ipipe/xenomai. We hope that this contribution will encourage further
> development of arm64 support in ipipe/xenomai.
>
> This port was largely developed on ipipe-3.10 as a bas
On 09/01/2015 02:27 PM, Dmitriy Cherkasov wrote:
> We have seen this before, but so far have not found a way to consistently
> reproduce it.
>
> There are some caveats with the current way context switching is done in
> Xenomai.
>
> On armv7, there was a completely separate implementation of
>
On 09/01/2015 09:11 PM, Jorge Ramirez Ortiz wrote:
> On 09/01/2015 02:27 PM, Dmitriy Cherkasov wrote:
>> We have seen this before, but so far have not found a way to consistently
>> reproduce it.
>>
>> There are some caveats with the current way context switching is done in
>> Xenomai.
>>
>> On ar
On 09/01/2015 09:11 PM, Jorge Ramirez Ortiz wrote:
> On 09/01/2015 02:27 PM, Dmitriy Cherkasov wrote:
>> We have seen this before, but so far have not found a way to consistently
>> reproduce it.
>>
>> There are some caveats with the current way context switching is done in
>> Xenomai.
>>
>> On ar
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 03:11:05PM -0400, Jorge Ramirez Ortiz wrote:
> On 09/01/2015 02:27 PM, Dmitriy Cherkasov wrote:
> > We have seen this before, but so far have not found a way to consistently
> > reproduce it.
> >
> > There are some caveats with the current way context switching is done in
>>
>> Thanks Dimitry.
>> I'll also try to look into this for this specific platform (however I am
>> hopping
>> that either Gilles or Philippe can spend some time on this soon)
>
> No arm64 hw here, so unless this is easily reproducible on a vm, I can
> only help with code review. Did you enable
On 09/01/2015 03:30 PM, Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On 09/01/2015 09:11 PM, Jorge Ramirez Ortiz wrote:
>> On 09/01/2015 02:27 PM, Dmitriy Cherkasov wrote:
>>> We have seen this before, but so far have not found a way to consistently
>>> reproduce it.
>>>
>>> There are some caveats with the current way
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Jorge Ramirez Ortiz wrote:
>
> Don mentioned that the trace is not ready yet.
We do have the ipipe tracer patch for arm64. We've been running it on
a vendor-specific platform. Will send out the patch after testing it
on QEMU.
Hongfei
_
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Jorge Ramirez Ortiz wrote:
>
>
> > This latency seems high for such class of hardware, especially with no
> > load. We'll need the tracer to dig this too.
> >
>
> Don mentioned that the trace is not ready yet.
>
I updated the branches on our server:
xenomai - arm6
10 matches
Mail list logo