Re: xeno-test failed due to cond_destroy error

2021-05-10 Thread Fangsuo Wu via Xenomai
BTW, I just wrote an application which is exactly the same with autoinit_simple_conddestroy. And it can run successfully in my board. 1 #include 2 #include 3 int main(void) 4 { 5 >---pthread_cond_t cond = PTHREAD_COND_INITIALIZER; 6 >---if(pthread_cond_destroy() == 0) 7

Re: xeno-test failed due to cond_destroy error

2021-05-10 Thread Fangsuo Wu via Xenomai
Jan, I removed the CFLAGS and LDFLAGS, with configure command: ./configure --build=i686-pc-linux-gnu --host=arm-linux-gnueabihf --with-core=cobalt --enable-smp --enable-lazy-setsched --enable-debug=symbols But the issue still remains. I changed the failed test case as below, the issue still

Re: xeno-test failed due to cond_destroy error

2021-05-10 Thread Jan Kiszka via Xenomai
On 10.05.21 09:20, Fangsuo Wu wrote: > Jan, > Thanks for your reply. The environment I used is listed below. BTW, I > can run latency test successfully. > > 1. The revision of Xenomai: xenomai-3.1.tar.bz2 > 2. Soc: dual ARM cortex A7 > 3. How I built application libraries: > ./configure

Re: xeno-test failed due to cond_destroy error

2021-05-10 Thread Fangsuo Wu via Xenomai
Jan, Thanks for your reply. The environment I used is listed below. BTW, I can run latency test successfully. 1. The revision of Xenomai: xenomai-3.1.tar.bz2 2. Soc: dual ARM cortex A7 3. How I built application libraries: ./configure CFLAGS="-march=armv7-a -mfpu=vfp3" LDFLAGS="-march=armv7-a

Re: [PATCH wip/dovetail 1/1] cobalt: Remove duplicate timespec/itimerspec copy helpers

2021-05-10 Thread Jan Kiszka via Xenomai
On 07.05.21 17:18, Florian Bezdeka wrote: > The variant of such helpers which are using a temporary element on the > stack work in both worlds, so on systems with 4 and 8 byte time_t. > To keep the code as simple as possible we can remove the > __BITS_PER_LONG == 64 implementation. > >

Re: xeno-test failed due to cond_destroy error

2021-05-10 Thread Jan Kiszka via Xenomai
On 10.05.21 03:56, Fangsuo Wu via Xenomai wrote: > Hi, I met below errors when running xeno-test in my board: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *sh-4.4# ./xeno-testStarted child 209: /bin/sh > /usr/xenomai/bin/xeno-test-run-wrapper ./xeno-test++ echo 0++ >

Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] Adressing y2038 test failures on ARM and BBB

2021-05-10 Thread Jan Kiszka via Xenomai
On 07.05.21 23:51, Florian Bezdeka wrote: > The CI pipeline discovered an invalid instruction on some ARM boards, > especially the BBB (beaglebone black). Applying this patch series should > fix the current test failure on "next" branch. > > As already discussed: There might be another problem in