[RFC] status of [meta-]xenomai for Yocto

2021-05-03 Thread Philippe Gerum via Xenomai
I'd like to discuss the current status of what exists, what might be planned regarding a meta layer which would/does provide support for Xenomai-enabled kernels. This could be a topic raised during the next community meeting. I can see a couple of options floating around on the net, all dedicate

Re: [RFC] status of [meta-]xenomai for Yocto

2021-05-03 Thread Henning Schild via Xenomai
We have xenomai-images kind of maintained under the umbrella of the project. But that is Isar and Yocto sure has its place as well. I have also seen buildroot layers which include xenomai. Such integration systems tend to cause a lot of work. A project like xenomai probably wants to be "very close

Re: [RFC] status of [meta-]xenomai for Yocto

2021-05-03 Thread Jan Kiszka via Xenomai
On 03.05.21 19:16, Henning Schild via Xenomai wrote: > We have xenomai-images kind of maintained under the umbrella of the > project. But that is Isar and Yocto sure has its place as well. I have > also seen buildroot layers which include xenomai. > > Such integration systems tend to cause a lot o

Re: [RFC] status of [meta-]xenomai for Yocto

2021-05-05 Thread Stefano Babic via Xenomai
Hi Philippe, Jan, Henning, On 03.05.21 19:30, Jan Kiszka via Xenomai wrote: On 03.05.21 19:16, Henning Schild via Xenomai wrote: We have xenomai-images kind of maintained under the umbrella of the project. But that is Isar and Yocto sure has its place as well. I have also seen buildroot layers

Re: [RFC] status of [meta-]xenomai for Yocto

2021-05-05 Thread Henning Schild via Xenomai
Am Wed, 5 May 2021 10:19:50 +0200 schrieb Stefano Babic : > Hi Philippe, Jan, Henning, > > On 03.05.21 19:30, Jan Kiszka via Xenomai wrote: > > On 03.05.21 19:16, Henning Schild via Xenomai wrote: > >> We have xenomai-images kind of maintained under the umbrella of the > >> project. But that is