On 06/19/2016 07:34 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 07:28:43PM +0200, Philippe Gerum wrote:
>> On 06/18/2016 03:37 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 03:21:40PM +0200, Philippe Gerum wrote:
On 06/18/2016 03:08 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>
On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 07:28:43PM +0200, Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On 06/18/2016 03:37 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 03:21:40PM +0200, Philippe Gerum wrote:
> >> On 06/18/2016 03:08 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> >>> Hi Philippe,
> >>>
> >>> it seems since I-pipe com
On 06/18/2016 03:37 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 03:21:40PM +0200, Philippe Gerum wrote:
>> On 06/18/2016 03:08 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>> Hi Philippe,
>>>
>>> it seems since I-pipe commit
>>> b115c4094d734e19fa7a96be1bf3958b3d244b8b on the ipipe-3.18 branch:
>
On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 08:20:31PM +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 07:20:41PM +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 03:52:35PM +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 03:21:40PM +0200, Philippe Gerum wrote:
> > > > On 06
On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 07:20:41PM +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 03:52:35PM +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 03:21:40PM +0200, Philippe Gerum wrote:
> > > On 06/18/2016 03:08 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> > > > Hi Philippe,
> > > >
>
On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 03:52:35PM +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 03:21:40PM +0200, Philippe Gerum wrote:
> > On 06/18/2016 03:08 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> > > Hi Philippe,
> > >
> > > it seems since I-pipe commit
> > > b115c4094d734e19fa7a96be1bf3958b3d244b8b
On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 03:21:40PM +0200, Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On 06/18/2016 03:08 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> > Hi Philippe,
> >
> > it seems since I-pipe commit
> > b115c4094d734e19fa7a96be1bf3958b3d244b8b on the ipipe-3.18 branch:
> > Revert "ipipe: Register function tracer for dir
On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 03:21:40PM +0200, Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On 06/18/2016 03:08 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> > Hi Philippe,
> >
> > it seems since I-pipe commit
> > b115c4094d734e19fa7a96be1bf3958b3d244b8b on the ipipe-3.18 branch:
> > Revert "ipipe: Register function tracer for dir
On 06/18/2016 03:08 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Hi Philippe,
>
> it seems since I-pipe commit
> b115c4094d734e19fa7a96be1bf3958b3d244b8b on the ipipe-3.18 branch:
> Revert "ipipe: Register function tracer for direct and exclusive
> invocation"
>
> This reverts commit e00888b4aa
Hi Philippe,
it seems since I-pipe commit
b115c4094d734e19fa7a96be1bf3958b3d244b8b on the ipipe-3.18 branch:
Revert "ipipe: Register function tracer for direct and exclusive invocation"
This reverts commit e00888b4aae45d9b84698a62079dde14c9be5fd3.
We now have an I-pipe-compat
10 matches
Mail list logo