On 2017-12-15 22:29, Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On 12/15/2017 06:53 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2017-12-15 17:45, Philippe Gerum wrote:
>>> On 12/15/2017 04:02 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2017-12-15 15:44, Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On 12/15/2017 03:24 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2017-12-14 20:
On 12/15/2017 06:53 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2017-12-15 17:45, Philippe Gerum wrote:
>> On 12/15/2017 04:02 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> On 2017-12-15 15:44, Philippe Gerum wrote:
On 12/15/2017 03:24 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2017-12-14 20:44, Philippe Gerum wrote:
>> On 12/14/2017 08:
On 12/15/2017 06:53 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2017-12-15 17:45, Philippe Gerum wrote:
>> On 12/15/2017 04:02 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> On 2017-12-15 15:44, Philippe Gerum wrote:
On 12/15/2017 03:24 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2017-12-14 20:44, Philippe Gerum wrote:
>> On 12/14/2017 08:
On 2017-12-15 18:27, Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On 12/15/2017 05:45 PM, Philippe Gerum wrote:
>> On 12/15/2017 04:02 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> On 2017-12-15 15:44, Philippe Gerum wrote:
On 12/15/2017 03:24 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2017-12-14 20:44, Philippe Gerum wrote:
>> On 12/14/2017
On 2017-12-15 17:45, Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On 12/15/2017 04:02 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2017-12-15 15:44, Philippe Gerum wrote:
>>> On 12/15/2017 03:24 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2017-12-14 20:44, Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On 12/14/2017 08:28 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Hi Philippe,
On 12/15/2017 05:45 PM, Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On 12/15/2017 04:02 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2017-12-15 15:44, Philippe Gerum wrote:
>>> On 12/15/2017 03:24 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2017-12-14 20:44, Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On 12/14/2017 08:28 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Hi Philippe,
>
On 12/15/2017 04:02 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2017-12-15 15:44, Philippe Gerum wrote:
>> On 12/15/2017 03:24 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> On 2017-12-14 20:44, Philippe Gerum wrote:
On 12/14/2017 08:28 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Hi Philippe,
>
> something got broken with the exception pa
On 2017-12-15 15:44, Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On 12/15/2017 03:24 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2017-12-14 20:44, Philippe Gerum wrote:
>>> On 12/14/2017 08:28 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Hi Philippe,
something got broken with the exception path rework:
[2.619458] debug: unmappi
On 12/15/2017 03:24 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2017-12-14 20:44, Philippe Gerum wrote:
>> On 12/14/2017 08:28 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> Hi Philippe,
>>>
>>> something got broken with the exception path rework:
>>>
>>> [2.619458] debug: unmapping init [mem
>>> 0x81b43000-0x81ee5
On 2017-12-14 20:44, Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On 12/14/2017 08:28 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Hi Philippe,
>>
>> something got broken with the exception path rework:
>>
>> [2.619458] debug: unmapping init [mem
>> 0x81b43000-0x81ee5fff]
>> [2.622011] BUG: using __this_cpu_read()
On 12/14/2017 08:28 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Hi Philippe,
>
> something got broken with the exception path rework:
>
> [2.619458] debug: unmapping init [mem
> 0x81b43000-0x81ee5fff]
> [2.622011] BUG: using __this_cpu_read() in preemptible [] code:
> init/1
> [
Hi Philippe,
something got broken with the exception path rework:
[2.619458] debug: unmapping init [mem 0x81b43000-0x81ee5fff]
[2.622011] BUG: using __this_cpu_read() in preemptible [] code:
init/1
[2.623446] caller is __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x13/0x20
[2
12 matches
Mail list logo