> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Kiszka
> Sent: Freitag, 15. November 2019 14:36
> To: Lange Norbert ; Xenomai
> (xenomai@xenomai.org)
> Subject: Re: RTnet sendmmsg and ENOBUFS
>
> NON-ANDRITZ SOURCE: BE CAUTIOUS WITH CONTENT, LINKS OR
> ATTACHMENTS.
>
On 15.11.19 13:37, Lange Norbert wrote:
I suppose the receive path works similarly.
RX works by accepting a global-pool buffer (this is where incoming packets
first end up in) filled with data in exchange to an empty rtskb from the
socket
pool. That filled rtskb is put into the
>
> >
> >>
> >>> I suppose the receive path works similarly.
> >>>
> >>
> >> RX works by accepting a global-pool buffer (this is where incoming packets
> >> first end up in) filled with data in exchange to an empty rtskb from the
> socket
> >> pool. That filled rtskb is put into the socket pool
On 15.11.19 11:10, Lange Norbert via Xenomai wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jan Kiszka
Sent: Donnerstag, 14. November 2019 19:18
To: Lange Norbert ; Xenomai
(xenomai@xenomai.org)
Cc: Philippe Gerum (r...@xenomai.org)
Subject: Re: RTnet sendmmsg and ENOBUFS
NON-ANDRITZ SOURCE
On 14.11.19 19:18, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 14.11.19 18:55, Lange Norbert wrote:
According to the code in __rtdm_fd_sendmmsg, that’s not what happens,
ENOBUFS would be returned instead,
And the amount of sent packets is lost forever.
if (datagrams > 0 && (ret == 0 || ret == -EWOULDBLOCK)) {
/*
ia Xenomai
Sent: Mittwoch, 13. November 2019 18:53
To: Jan Kiszka ; Xenomai
(xenomai@xenomai.org)
Subject: RE: RTnet sendmmsg and ENOBUFS
NON-ANDRITZ SOURCE: BE CAUTIOUS WITH CONTENT, LINKS OR
ATTACHMENTS.
-Original Message-
From: Jan Kiszka
Sent: Mittwoch, 13. November 2019 18:39
To: Lan
e-
> From: Xenomai On Behalf Of Lange
> Norbert via Xenomai
> Sent: Mittwoch, 13. November 2019 18:53
> To: Jan Kiszka ; Xenomai
> (xenomai@xenomai.org)
> Subject: RE: RTnet sendmmsg and ENOBUFS
>
> NON-ANDRITZ SOURCE: BE CAUTIOUS WITH CONTENT, LINKS OR
> ATTACHMENTS.
>
&
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Kiszka
> Sent: Mittwoch, 13. November 2019 18:39
> To: Lange Norbert ; Xenomai
> (xenomai@xenomai.org)
> Subject: Re: RTnet sendmmsg and ENOBUFS
>
> NON-ANDRITZ SOURCE: BE CAUTIOUS WITH CONTENT, LINKS OR
> ATTACHMENTS.
>
On 13.11.19 16:10, Lange Norbert via Xenomai wrote:
Hello,
for one of our applications, we have (unfortunatly) a single ethernet
connection for Realtime and Nonrealtime.
We solve this by sending timeslices with RT first, then filling up the
remaining space. When stressing the limits (quite
Hello,
for one of our applications, we have (unfortunatly) a single ethernet
connection for Realtime and Nonrealtime.
We solve this by sending timeslices with RT first, then filling up the
remaining space. When stressing the limits (quite possibly beyond if accounting
for bugs),
the sendmmsg
10 matches
Mail list logo
