Re: [Xenomai-core] Cosmetic changes to script xeno-config + man page

2005-10-19 Thread Romain Lenglet
  A simpler solution would be to ship a xenomai.m4 to be used   as a acinclude.m4 in every project using Xenomai. But I   have had very bad experiences with aclocal in that use   case. aclocal is quite buggy. And it would be more   confortable for projects it is were immediately available  

Re: [Xenomai-core] Testing the adeos-ipipe-2.6.13-ppc-1.0-00.patch

2005-10-19 Thread Wolfgang Grandegger
On 10/17/2005 05:42 PM Fillod Stephane wrote: Hi Philippe, Sorry for the late report, Xenomai appears to work fine on a Freescale e500 board (MPC8541E) under Linux 2.6.13. Xenomai version was v1.9.9, ie. the daily snapshot as of today. Here are some preliminary figures (CPU 800MHz, Bus

RE: [Xenomai-core] Testing the adeos-ipipe-2.6.13-ppc-1.0-00.patch

2005-10-19 Thread Fillod Stephane
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: [...] Load for klatency/latency was ping flooding on FCC (piece of cake), and cache calibrator. IMHO, we can do nastier. You mean the cache calibrator from http://monetdb.cwi.nl/Calibrator/? I tried it on my Ocotea board and it increased the max latency for 25 to 30

[Xenomai-core] Latest man pages

2005-10-19 Thread Romain Lenglet
I have submitted a last patch that adds the last manpages: xeno-info(1) and xeno-test(1) https://gna.org/patch/index.php?func=detailitemitem_id=475 The manpage for xeno-test also documents the options for latency and klatency, since xeno-test's options are a superset of their options. Please

Re: [Xenomai-core] Xenomai latency tests on various PowerPC boards

2005-10-19 Thread Philippe Gerum
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: On 10/18/2005 08:14 PM Philippe Gerum wrote: Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: On 10/18/2005 01:44 PM Philippe Gerum wrote: Philippe Gerum wrote: Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: Hallo, attached you will find the results of Xemonai latency measurements on various

Re: [Xenomai-core] Testing the adeos-ipipe-2.6.13-ppc-1.0-00.patch

2005-10-19 Thread Philippe Gerum
Fillod Stephane wrote: Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: [...] Load for klatency/latency was ping flooding on FCC (piece of cake), and cache calibrator. IMHO, we can do nastier. You mean the cache calibrator from http://monetdb.cwi.nl/Calibrator/? I tried it on my Ocotea board and it increased the

Re: [Xenomai-core] Testing the adeos-ipipe-2.6.13-ppc-1.0-00.patch

2005-10-19 Thread Philippe Gerum
Fillod Stephane wrote: Philippe Gerum wrote: [..] http://download.gna.org/adeos/patches/v2.6/adeos/ppc/adeos-ipipe-2.6.13- ppc-1.0-02.patch Here is the result of tests with version 1.0-02 on e500: load: ~1 minute ping -f, one run of calibrator chewing 64MiB. $ cat /proc/ipipe/version 1.0-02

[Xenomai-core] [patch] doc fix in rtdm

2005-10-19 Thread Jan Kiszka
Hi, someone ;) complained about this statement regarding rtdm_task_busy_sleep. I think he is right. --- drvlib.c(revision 44) +++ drvlib.c(working copy) @@ -335,7 +335,7 @@ * - Kernel-based task * - User-space task (RT, non-RT) * - * Rescheduling: always. + * Rescheduling: never.

Re: [Xenomai-core] RTLWS 2005 - who plans to attend?

2005-10-19 Thread Jan Kiszka
Dmitry Adamushko wrote: Hi everybody, a notification [1] has been posted today on the RTAI mailing list concerning the RTLWS 2005 agenda [2]. So who is going to attend that workshop? Could someone share his/her Me, likely. Yuchen Zhang (RT-Firewire) is also almost persuaded.

[Xenomai-core] TLB misses on MPC 8xx

2005-10-19 Thread Wolfgang Grandegger
Hello, the output of the cache calibrator indicated, that TLB misses on the MPC 860 might influence latencies substantially. Looking closer to the Linux 2.6 kernel revealed, that TLB entries for the kernel space (0xc000) are not pinned by default for the MPC 860 (like in 2.4). I enabled this

[Xenomai-core] [Patch] Anonymous (NULL-named) objects from user-space

2005-10-19 Thread Dmitry Adamushko
Hi, anonymous objects (name == NULL) from user-space get registered under unique names, - which is a string representation of the object's kernel-space address, - but remain not-exported via the /proc interface. Not tested with the all objects yet (well, I have upgraded the system, a