Re: [Xenomai-core] Re: [PATCH] Shared interrupts (ready to merge)

Hi Dmitry, Dmitry Adamushko wrote: > Hi Jan, > > let's make yet another revision of the bits : > > new XN_ISR_HANDLED == old XN_ISR_HANDLED + old XN_ISR_NO_ENABLE > > ok. > > new XN_ISR_NOENABLE == ~ old XN_ISR_ENABLE > > ok. > > new XN_ISR_PROPAGATE == XN_ISR_CHAINED > > ok. > Just to m

Re: [Xenomai-core] Re: [PATCH] Shared interrupts (ready to merge)

Hi Jan, let's make yet another revision of the bits : new XN_ISR_HANDLED  == old XN_ISR_HANDLED + old XN_ISR_NO_ENABLE ok. new XN_ISR_NOENABLE == ~ old XN_ISR_ENABLE ok. new XN_ISR_PROPAGATE == XN_ISR_CHAINED ok. new XN_ISR_NOINT == ? does it suppose the interrupt line to be .end-ed (enab

Re: [Xenomai-core] Re: [PATCH] Shared interrupts (ready to merge)

Hi Dmitry, Dmitry Adamushko wrote: > Hi Jan, > > let's make yet another revision of the bits : > > new XN_ISR_HANDLED == old XN_ISR_HANDLED + old XN_ISR_NO_ENABLE > > ok. > > new XN_ISR_NOENABLE == ~ old XN_ISR_ENABLE > > ok. > > new XN_ISR_PROPAGATE == XN_ISR_CHAINED > > ok. > Just to m

Re: [Xenomai-core] Re: [PATCH] Shared interrupts (ready to merge)

Hi Jan, let's make yet another revision of the bits : new XN_ISR_HANDLED  == old XN_ISR_HANDLED + old XN_ISR_NO_ENABLE ok. new XN_ISR_NOENABLE == ~ old XN_ISR_ENABLE ok. new XN_ISR_PROPAGATE == XN_ISR_CHAINED ok. new XN_ISR_NOINT == ? does it suppose the interrupt line to be .end-ed (enab