Re: [Xenomai-core] Re: [PATCH] Shared interrupts (ready to merge)

Anders Blomdell wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Philippe Gerum wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Dmitry Adamushko wrote: ... This said, I'm going to publish the shirq patch (after finalizing ISR return bits, where I still have some doubts) without enable/disable nesting support. It can be supported

Re: [Xenomai-core] Xenomai patch packaging concerns

Romain Lenglet wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Romain Lenglet wrote: +while read f; do +f=`echo $f | cut -d/ -f2-` +d=`dirname $f` +if test x$output_patch = x; then +mkdir -p $linux_tree/$link_dir/$d \ +

Re: [Xenomai-core] Re: [PATCH] Shared interrupts (ready to merge)

Anders Blomdell wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Philippe Gerum wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Dmitry Adamushko wrote: ... This said, I'm going to publish the shirq patch (after finalizing ISR return bits, where I still have some doubts) without enable/disable nesting support. It can be supported at

AW: [Xenomai-core] vxworks-skin taskSpawn

Thank you for caring about my problem ! Perhaps I should have mentioned in my earlier postings that I am using a PowerPC platform. I hope this does not nullify your prior analyses. These are the outputs (with some of my debug outputs), when I start satch. # ./satch Xenomai: UVM skin or

[Xenomai-core] [BUG] prepare-kernel is broken

Hi, the last check-in seems to have messed something up: .../xenomai/scripts/prepare-kernel.sh: line 61: syntax error near unexpected token `fi' I do not understand what's going on here, so I don't want to hack some probably wrong fix for this. Jan signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital

Re: AW: [Xenomai-core] vxworks-skin taskSpawn

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thank you for caring about my problem ! Perhaps I should have mentioned in my earlier postings that I am using a PowerPC platform. I hope this does not nullify your prior analyses. These are the outputs (with some of my debug outputs), when I start satch. # ./satch

Re: [Xenomai-core] Xenomai patch packaging concerns

Philippe Gerum wrote: Romain Lenglet wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Romain Lenglet wrote: +while read f; do +f=`echo $f | cut -d/ -f2-` +d=`dirname $f` +if test x$output_patch = x; then +mkdir -p $linux_tree/$link_dir/$d \

Re: [Xenomai-core] [BUG] prepare-kernel is broken

Jan Kiszka wrote: Hi, the last check-in seems to have messed something up: .../xenomai/scripts/prepare-kernel.sh: line 61: syntax error near unexpected token `fi' I do not understand what's going on here, so I don't want to hack some probably wrong fix for this. In order to

Re: [Xenomai-core] Re: skin libs, libtool warnings, and -module

Jan Kiszka wrote: Philippe Gerum wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Hi Philippe, I noticed you fixed the libtool warning during xenomai build - by linking the testsuite statically... :-/ This is just a workaround and doesn't help external users. Yes, it's clearly hacky-patchy, however, I don't see

Re: [Xenomai-core] [BUG] prepare-kernel is broken

Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Hi, the last check-in seems to have messed something up: .../xenomai/scripts/prepare-kernel.sh: line 61: syntax error near unexpected token `fi' I do not understand what's going on here, so I don't want to hack some

[Xenomai-core] [PATCH] Shared interrupts (yet another movie :)

Hi there, I have explicitly cc'ed Gilles as this patch affects the posix skin. In the light of the recent discussions, the AUTOENA flag has been converted to NOAUTOENA and the IRQ line is re-enabled on return from xnintr_irq_handler() and shirq brothers by default. Also XN_ISR_CHAINED -

Re: [Xenomai-core] [BUG] prepare-kernel is broken

Jan Kiszka wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Hi, the last check-in seems to have messed something up: .../xenomai/scripts/prepare-kernel.sh: line 61: syntax error near unexpected token `fi' I do not understand what's going on here,