Re: [Xenomai-core] [patch] fix xeno-test for busybox

2006-09-13 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Hi, I just tried to fire up xeno-test on a busybox system - without success. Reason: missing getopts. But busybox initial test checks for something else, namely getopt. The attached patch should fix

Re: [Xenomai-core] [patch] fix xeno-test for busybox

2006-09-13 Thread Romain Lenglet
Romain Lenglet wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Hi, I just tried to fire up xeno-test on a busybox system - without success. Reason: missing getopts. But busybox initial test checks for something else, namely getopt. The

Re: [Xenomai-core] [patch] fix xeno-test for busybox

2006-09-13 Thread Romain Lenglet
Romain Lenglet wrote: Romain Lenglet wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Hi, I just tried to fire up xeno-test on a busybox system - without success. Reason: missing getopts. But busybox initial test checks for something

Re: [Xenomai-core] No hardware interrupts with xenomai on ppc405

2006-09-13 Thread Philippe Gerum
On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 12:37 +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: Matthias Fuchs wrote: On Monday 11 September 2006 20:13, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: In 2.6 the interrupts are disabled by default. Then the attached patch for Xenomai should help. Wolfgang. Your patch also works fine.

Re: [Xenomai-core] No hardware interrupts with xenomai on ppc405

2006-09-13 Thread Philippe Gerum
On Wed, 2006-09-13 at 12:34 +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: Philippe Gerum wrote: On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 12:37 +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: Matthias Fuchs wrote: On Monday 11 September 2006 20:13, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: In 2.6 the interrupts are disabled by default. Then the

Re: [Xenomai-core] No hardware interrupts with xenomai on ppc405

2006-09-13 Thread Philippe Gerum
On Wed, 2006-09-13 at 13:36 +0200, Philippe Gerum wrote: On Wed, 2006-09-13 at 12:34 +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: Philippe Gerum wrote: On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 12:37 +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: Matthias Fuchs wrote: On Monday 11 September 2006 20:13, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:

Re: [Xenomai-core] No hardware interrupts with xenomai on ppc405

2006-09-13 Thread Philippe Gerum
On Wed, 2006-09-13 at 14:38 +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: Philippe Gerum wrote: On Wed, 2006-09-13 at 13:36 +0200, Philippe Gerum wrote: On Wed, 2006-09-13 at 12:34 +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: Philippe Gerum wrote: On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 12:37 +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:

Re: [Xenomai-core] No hardware interrupts with xenomai on ppc405

2006-09-13 Thread Philippe Gerum
On Wed, 2006-09-13 at 14:38 +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: Philippe Gerum wrote: On Wed, 2006-09-13 at 13:36 +0200, Philippe Gerum wrote: On Wed, 2006-09-13 at 12:34 +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: Philippe Gerum wrote: On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 12:37 +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:

Re: [Xenomai-core] switchtest on systems without FPU

2006-09-13 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: Hello, I tried to run switchtest -n on a AMCC 440GX, which does not have an FPU and get an illegal instruction in sleeper. It seems to call FPU instruction even with option -n. Thanks. This should be fixed by commit 1603. Thanks for reporting. --