[Sorry for the delay, I was quite busy those days and unable to test the
patch...]
Le mardi 19 septembre 2006 à 17:34 +0200, Jan Kiszka a écrit :
> >
> > Or maybe we should lower the API level a little bit, and let the user
> > specify the physical address of the mapping instead of the virtual
>
Stelian Pop wrote:
> [Sorry for the delay, I was quite busy those days and unable to test the
> patch...]
>
> Le mardi 19 septembre 2006 à 17:34 +0200, Jan Kiszka a écrit :
>>> Or maybe we should lower the API level a little bit, and let the user
>>> specify the physical address of the mapping ins
Le vendredi 22 septembre 2006 à 10:58 +0200, Jan Kiszka a écrit :
> > d) make a special rtdm_mmap_iomem_to_user() function...
>
> Also an option. Specifically, it wouldn't break the existing API... What
> about rtdm_iomap_to_user? Would you like to work out a patch in this
> direction?
Here
Stelian Pop wrote:
> Le vendredi 22 septembre 2006 à 10:58 +0200, Jan Kiszka a écrit :
>
>>> d) make a special rtdm_mmap_iomem_to_user() function...
>> Also an option. Specifically, it wouldn't break the existing API... What
>> about rtdm_iomap_to_user? Would you like to work out a patch in th
Le vendredi 22 septembre 2006 à 16:41 +0200, Jan Kiszka a écrit :
> Stelian Pop wrote:
> > Le vendredi 22 septembre 2006 à 10:58 +0200, Jan Kiszka a écrit :
> >
> >>> d) make a special rtdm_mmap_iomem_to_user() function...
> >> Also an option. Specifically, it wouldn't break the existing API...
Hi Julien
On Friday 22 September 2006 07:06, OB wrote:
> My reference plateform is a FOX board, which include several GPIO and
> even a parallel port-like interface.
> http://www.acmesystems.it/?id=4
>
> Also, please let me know if anybody has any interest in this projet
> (beside me!)
I for one
