[Sorry for the delay, I was quite busy those days and unable to test the
patch...]
Le mardi 19 septembre 2006 à 17:34 +0200, Jan Kiszka a écrit :
Or maybe we should lower the API level a little bit, and let the user
specify the physical address of the mapping instead of the virtual
Stelian Pop wrote:
[Sorry for the delay, I was quite busy those days and unable to test the
patch...]
Le mardi 19 septembre 2006 à 17:34 +0200, Jan Kiszka a écrit :
Or maybe we should lower the API level a little bit, and let the user
specify the physical address of the mapping instead of
Le vendredi 22 septembre 2006 à 10:58 +0200, Jan Kiszka a écrit :
d) make a special rtdm_mmap_iomem_to_user() function...
Also an option. Specifically, it wouldn't break the existing API... What
about rtdm_iomap_to_user? Would you like to work out a patch in this
direction?
Here it
Stelian Pop wrote:
Le vendredi 22 septembre 2006 à 10:58 +0200, Jan Kiszka a écrit :
d) make a special rtdm_mmap_iomem_to_user() function...
Also an option. Specifically, it wouldn't break the existing API... What
about rtdm_iomap_to_user? Would you like to work out a patch in this
Hi Julien
On Friday 22 September 2006 07:06, OB wrote:
My reference plateform is a FOX board, which include several GPIO and
even a parallel port-like interface.
http://www.acmesystems.it/?id=4
Also, please let me know if anybody has any interest in this projet
(beside me!)
I for one
