Niklaus Giger wrote:
Am Montag, 25. September 2006 17:57 schrieb Philippe Gerum:
On Sun, 2006-09-24 at 23:07 +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Niklaus Giger wrote:
..
Ok, we can go for the lazy fix here, since this code is poised to
disappear anyway. I've merged a variant of the above we
On Mon, 2006-09-25 at 23:15 +0200, Niklaus Giger wrote:
Am Montag, 25. September 2006 22:59 schrieb Philippe Gerum:
On Mon, 2006-09-25 at 22:29 +0200, Niklaus Giger wrote:
Am Montag, 25. September 2006 17:57 schrieb Philippe Gerum:
On Sun, 2006-09-24 at 23:07 +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger
Hi friendsi want to create two aperiodic tasks .I have made a small example and created two tasks and set their priority equal.i have removed rt_task_setPeriodic function from the code but problem is that the task which is started first only it works and the second task which is started later
On Mon, 2006-09-25 at 22:29 +0200, Niklaus Giger wrote:
Am Montag, 25. September 2006 17:57 schrieb Philippe Gerum:
On Sun, 2006-09-24 at 23:07 +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Niklaus Giger wrote:
..
Is the output of lines like Xenomai: Switching display-3238 to secondary
-- Debut du message initial ---
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Copies : xenomai-core@gna.org
Date : Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:21:18 +0200
Objet : Re: [Xenomai-core] Problem with periodic timer on
PPC40x solved
On Mon, 2006-09-25 at 22:29 +0200, Niklaus Giger
On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 16:56 +0200, gilles.chanteperdrix wrote:
-- Debut du message initial ---
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Copies : xenomai-core@gna.org
Date : Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:21:18 +0200
Objet : Re: [Xenomai-core] Problem with periodic
Philippe Gerum wrote:
On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 16:56 +0200, gilles.chanteperdrix wrote:
-- Debut du message initial ---
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Copies : xenomai-core@gna.org
Date : Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:21:18 +0200
Objet : Re: [Xenomai-core] Problem
On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 18:28 +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 16:56 +0200, gilles.chanteperdrix wrote:
-- Debut du message initial ---
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Copies : xenomai-core@gna.org
Date
Philippe Gerum wrote:
On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 18:28 +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 16:56 +0200, gilles.chanteperdrix wrote:
-- Debut du message initial ---
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Copies :
Am Dienstag, 26. September 2006 16:21 schrieb Philippe Gerum:
On Mon, 2006-09-25 at 22:29 +0200, Niklaus Giger wrote:
Am Montag, 25. September 2006 17:57 schrieb Philippe Gerum:
On Sun, 2006-09-24 at 23:07 +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Niklaus Giger wrote:
..
Is the
Am Dienstag, 26. September 2006 18:28 schrieb Wolfgang Grandegger:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 16:56 +0200, gilles.chanteperdrix wrote:
OK, but in general, soft-float emulation should be used on systems
without FPU and this is even more important for real-time. This is a
tool
Here is the stack with adeos-ipipe 1.3 after applying your patch
(gdb) info stack
#0 xnpod_fault_handler (fltinfo=0xc1489e18) at
kernel/xenomai/nucleus/pod.c:216
#1 0xc004bad4 in xnpod_trap_fault (fltinfo=0x73) at
kernel/xenomai/nucleus/pod.c:2907
#2 0xc0043ee8 in xnarch_trap_fault
On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 21:34 +0200, Niklaus Giger wrote:
Here is the stack with adeos-ipipe 1.3 after applying your patch
(gdb) info stack
#0 xnpod_fault_handler (fltinfo=0xc1489e18) at
kernel/xenomai/nucleus/pod.c:216
#1 0xc004bad4 in xnpod_trap_fault (fltinfo=0x73) at
13 matches
Mail list logo
