Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just realized the error message:
>
>Error after context switch from task 8(rtup-8) to task
>10(rtup_ufpp-10), FPU registers were set to 1000 (maybe task
>sleeper_ufps-0)
>
> when running "switchtest" on
On Sun, 2006-10-22 at 15:39 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > while actually cross-checking some user's problem with RTnet (not on
> > Xenomai), I happen to stumble over another weirdness. Scenario:
> >
> > RTnet under high load (>5 KHz network IRQ rate,
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while actually cross-checking some user's problem with RTnet (not on
> Xenomai), I happen to stumble over another weirdness. Scenario:
>
> RTnet under high load (>5 KHz network IRQ rate, large packets), "latency
> -p1000" as additional load, Pentium 266 MHz (tri
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just realized the error message:
>
>Error after context switch from task 8(rtup-8) to task
>10(rtup_ufpp-10), FPU registers were set to 1000 (maybe task
>sleeper_ufps-0)
>
> when running "switchtest" on an PPC under Linux 2.6.18 with
Hello,
I just realized the error message:
Error after context switch from task 8(rtup-8) to task
10(rtup_ufpp-10), FPU registers were set to 1000 (maybe task
sleeper_ufps-0)
when running "switchtest" on an PPC under Linux 2.6.18 with Xenomai head
of SVN. I have attached the full output l
