Jeroen Van den Keybus wrote:
>>> I mean that the support of shared interrupts for ISA boards
>> (edge-triggered
>>> stuff) is a kind of emulation to overcome the shortcommings of the
>> initial
>>> design on the hardware level. The hardware was just not supposed to
>> support
>>> shared interrupt c
> I mean that the support of shared interrupts for ISA boards (edge-triggered> stuff) is a kind of emulation to overcome the shortcommings of the initial
> design on the hardware level. The hardware was just not supposed to support> shared interrupt channels. So, let's keep it a bit aside from ano
Jeroen Van den Keybus wrote:
>>> I mean that the support of shared interrupts for ISA boards
>> (edge-triggered
>>> stuff) is a kind of emulation to overcome the shortcommings of the
>> initial
>>> design on the hardware level. The hardware was just not supposed to
>> support
>>> shared interrupt c
> I mean that the support of shared interrupts for ISA boards (edge-triggered> stuff) is a kind of emulation to overcome the shortcommings of the initial
> design on the hardware level. The hardware was just not supposed to support> shared interrupt channels. So, let's keep it a bit aside from ano
Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
> On 31/01/06, Jan Kiszka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> the previous version contained an ugly bug, namely the misuse of the
>>> test_and_set/clear_bit interface
>>> that led to a broken system from time to time.
>>>
>> What about the
On 31/01/06, Jan Kiszka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dmitry Adamushko wrote:> Hi,>> the previous version contained an ugly bug, namely the misuse of the> test_and_set/clear_bit interface> that led to a broken system from time to time.>
What about the ISA/edge-triggered stuff? :DMy problem is that we
Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the previous version contained an ugly bug, namely the misuse of the
> test_and_set/clear_bit interface
> that led to a broken system from time to time.
>
And here is a tiny patch to make RTDM shared-IRQ-aware. If you release
another version before a merge, you
Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the previous version contained an ugly bug, namely the misuse of the
> test_and_set/clear_bit interface
> that led to a broken system from time to time.
>
What about the ISA/edge-triggered stuff? :D
My problem is that we cannot test here on real hardware becaus
Hi,
the previous version contained an ugly bug, namely the misuse of the test_and_set/clear_bit interface
that led to a broken system from time to time.
-- Best regards,Dmitry Adamushko
shirq-v6.patch
Description: Binary data
Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
> On 31/01/06, Jan Kiszka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> the previous version contained an ugly bug, namely the misuse of the
>>> test_and_set/clear_bit interface
>>> that led to a broken system from time to time.
>>>
>> What about the
On 31/01/06, Jan Kiszka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dmitry Adamushko wrote:> Hi,>> the previous version contained an ugly bug, namely the misuse of the> test_and_set/clear_bit interface> that led to a broken system from time to time.>
What about the ISA/edge-triggered stuff? :DMy problem is that we
Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the previous version contained an ugly bug, namely the misuse of the
> test_and_set/clear_bit interface
> that led to a broken system from time to time.
>
And here is a tiny patch to make RTDM shared-IRQ-aware. If you release
another version before a merge, you
Hi,
the previous version contained an ugly bug, namely the misuse of the test_and_set/clear_bit interface
that led to a broken system from time to time.
-- Best regards,Dmitry Adamushko
shirq-v6.patch
Description: Binary data
___
Xenomai-core mailing
Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the previous version contained an ugly bug, namely the misuse of the
> test_and_set/clear_bit interface
> that led to a broken system from time to time.
>
What about the ISA/edge-triggered stuff? :D
My problem is that we cannot test here on real hardware becaus
14 matches
Mail list logo
