On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 12:49 -0400, Andreas Glatz wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> >
> > Whenever possible, please post patches inline (I had to manually copy it
> > to allow commenting).
>
> Sure, no problem.
>
>
> >
> > You cannot bluntly call release() here. You may not run in Linux context
> > while th
Hi,
>
> Whenever possible, please post patches inline (I had to manually copy it
> to allow commenting).
Sure, no problem.
>
> You cannot bluntly call release() here. You may not run in Linux context
> while that handler demands this.
It's also called in xnpipe_disconnect() (if I follow 'g
Andreas Glatz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Currently, you can destroy RT_PIPE while a non-rt application is
> connected. If that happens the pipe won't be fully closed but
> some parts will be leftover for cleanup when closing the RT_PIPE
> from the non-rt application (lingering close).
>
> For us it would b
Hi,
Currently, you can destroy RT_PIPE while a non-rt application is
connected. If that happens the pipe won't be fully closed but
some parts will be leftover for cleanup when closing the RT_PIPE
from the non-rt application (lingering close).
For us it would be very convenient if we didn't have t
