Markus Franke wrote:
Dear all,
I am running some latency tests with irqbench/irqloop. I am wondering
whether it would be possible to achieve better results when activating
CONFIG_PREEMPT and CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARILY during the kernel
configuration and running irqloop in User Mode over
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hah, I waited for the first footer of this kind appearing on
mailing lists! As far as I understood the new German law,
this is not required when you post to public forums. But
probably your corporate mail server injects this automatically.
Jan
You are right. I
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Markus Franke wrote:
Dear all,
I am running some latency tests with irqbench/irqloop. I am wondering
whether it would be possible to achieve better results when activating
CONFIG_PREEMPT and CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARILY during the kernel
configuration and running irqloop in
Markus Franke wrote:
Hmm, I should have better said tiny. This experience is based on
I-pipe tracer observations, and I guess you don't have that thing on,
have you?
I have set:
---snip---
# CONFIG_IPIPE_DEBUG is not set
CONFIG_IPIPE_TRACE_ENABLE_VALUE=0
---snap---
in both kernels
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Of course, irqloop runs in *primary* mode to be able to handle the
events deterministically. So it is not directly affected by CONFIG_PREEMPT.
If I start irqloop in User-Mode, a thread is simply created via Linux
system call pthread_create() which interacts with the
On 14/02/07, Markus Franke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Of course, irqloop runs in *primary* mode to be able to handle the
events deterministically. So it is not directly affected by CONFIG_PREEMPT.
If I start irqloop in User-Mode, a thread is simply created via Linux
system
Markus Franke wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Of course, irqloop runs in *primary* mode to be able to handle the
events deterministically. So it is not directly affected by CONFIG_PREEMPT.
If I start irqloop in User-Mode, a thread is simply created via Linux
system call pthread_create() which
Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
On 14/02/07, Markus Franke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Of course, irqloop runs in *primary* mode to be able to handle the
events deterministically. So it is not directly affected by
CONFIG_PREEMPT.
If I start irqloop in User-Mode, a thread is
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anybody tell me, how I have to set the 2. parameter (starttp) of
pthread_make_periodic_np ?
When I use clock_gettime to fill startp I get a giant timeout value in
the /proc/xenomai/sched list and my task
Sorry for the stupid question but: what is tick_arg ? Do I have to configure
it within Xenomai or is it a kernel parameter ?
The timing of my target in principal is fine. When I set
tstart.tv_sec=0;
tstart.tv_nsec=0;
both to zero, my task gets peiodic (task runs every second). Just when
Hi,
Do u mean to say that if i have created my tasks using native xenomai API's
like rt_task_create , then inside those tasks i will have to use posix skin
calls like pthread_setschedpolicy, etc...?
Is that so.
Cant i just have context switch between the tasks themselves say low
priority and a
Hello,
you program does not use Xenomai services and is therefore off-topic
here, nevertheless...
mani bhatti wrote:
Hi
I have attached a kernel module parint.c.When i insert parint.ko into
kernel i get the following message from kernel .
Request_irq returns 0
Interrupt generated. You
12 matches
Mail list logo
