Re: [Xenomai-help] Hello, doubts with RT-CAN

quinty wrote: > Hello, > > I am testing RT-CAN with MPC5200 and linux 2.6.23.14 > , xenomai 2.4.2. > Well I have some doubts: > 1.- In kernel configuration, there is a parameter to change lenght of RX > CAN buffer, 1024 by default. > What units???, 1024 bytes,

Re: [Xenomai-help] Hello, doubts with RT-CAN

2008/6/17 Wolfgang Grandegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > quinty wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I am testing RT-CAN with MPC5200 and linux 2.6.23.14 , >> xenomai 2.4.2. >> Well I have some doubts: >> 1.- In kernel configuration, there is a parameter to change lenght of RX >

Re: [Xenomai-help] Hello, doubts with RT-CAN

quinty wrote: > > > 2008/6/17 Wolfgang Grandegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >: > > quinty wrote: > > Hello, > > I am testing RT-CAN with MPC5200 and linux 2.6.23.14 > , xenomai 2.4.2. >

[Xenomai-help] Blackfin BF-536 w/ Xenomai I-pipe Timer Issue

I have run into a problem with reconfiguring the i-pipe timer on the a Blackfin BF-536 processor. The problem stems from having allocated TIMER0 to a be used as a PWM on a BF-536 based board. With this in mind I tried to modify the Linux kernel to use a different timer (TIMER7) for the i-pipe t

Re: [Xenomai-help] Blackfin BF-536 w/ Xenomai I-pipe Timer Issue

Soon after posting the last post, I read it and saw that I was using TIMIL6 instead of TIMIL7 in arch/blackfin/mach-common/ints-priority-sc.c After changing this the board booted and everything worked and desired. I may be useful to make the timer used configurable in future builds to handle s