On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 6:15 PM, Travis Stratman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-04-30 at 08:13 +0200, Sebastian Smolorz wrote:
> > Travis Stratman wrote:
> > > I am working on getting Xenomai running on a board using the AT91SAM9260
> > > processor. The actual hardware on the board is
On Wed, 2008-04-30 at 08:13 +0200, Sebastian Smolorz wrote:
> Travis Stratman wrote:
> > I am working on getting Xenomai running on a board using the AT91SAM9260
> > processor. The actual hardware on the board is very similar to the
> > AT91SAM9260EK.
> >
> > I was able to patch and build the kerne
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 1:34 AM, Travis Stratman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The klatency test only works the first time that I run it, all further
> tests cause a segmentation fault. Here is the strace of the last few
> calls on klatency when it does fail:
> gettimeofday({1209511560, 302399},
Travis Stratman wrote:
> I am working on getting Xenomai running on a board using the AT91SAM9260
> processor. The actual hardware on the board is very similar to the
> AT91SAM9260EK.
>
> I was able to patch and build the kernel and userspace without a
> problem. However, when I run the latency tes
Hello,
I am working on getting Xenomai running on a board using the AT91SAM9260
processor. The actual hardware on the board is very similar to the
AT91SAM9260EK.
I was able to patch and build the kernel and userspace without a
problem. However, when I run the latency test, I often see the board
l
