Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
>>> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> I think message queues can work well but I'm not sure they are the best
> choice when I do not have to communicate any message. Would be
> semaphores best suited to my need
Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>> I think message queues can work well but I'm not sure they are the best
>>> choice when I do not have to communicate any message. Would be
>>> semaphores best suited to my needs?
>> You can use process-shared mutexes or semaphores.
>
> Ther
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> I think message queues can work well but I'm not sure they are the best
>> choice when I do not have to communicate any message. Would be
>> semaphores best suited to my needs?
>
> You can use process-shared mutexes or semaphores.
There is somewhere a comparison of
Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
> Hello. I'm writing a data acquisition system (the code will be released
> open source soon) and i chose to use Xenomai to obtain real time
> performances.
>
> The design of the system is inspired from JACK http://jackaudio.org/.
> Different functionalities are implemented
Hello. I'm writing a data acquisition system (the code will be released
open source soon) and i chose to use Xenomai to obtain real time
performances.
The design of the system is inspired from JACK http://jackaudio.org/.
Different functionalities are implemented in separate processes that
communic
