Re: [Xenomai-help] question about the latency test running on Blackfin

2006-04-12 Thread Jan Kiszka
Li Yi wrote: Hi Philippe, According to your answers, I updated the document on Xenomai on Blackfin: (http://docs.blackfin.uclinux.org/doku.php?id=adeos) with the test result of different modes, setting XENO_OPT_TIMING_SCHEDLAT = 1. But I still have some question about the test result,

Re: [Xenomai-help] question about the latency test running on Blackfin

2006-04-12 Thread adam li
Thanks for the suggestions. I am using Blackfin 533 on the STAMP board. The core frequency is 398 MHz.These data are got when there is not special workload, only uClinux running. I tried to run latency test in Mode 0 (user space task) for 60 sec, with the calibrator as work load, this time the

Re: [Xenomai-help] question about the latency test running on Blackfin

2006-04-12 Thread Jan Kiszka
adam li wrote: Thanks for the suggestions. I am using Blackfin 533 on the STAMP board. The core frequency is 398 MHz.These data are got when there is not special workload, only uClinux running. I tried to run latency test in Mode 0 (user space task) for 60 sec, with the calibrator as

Re: [Xenomai-help] question about the latency test running on Blackfin

2006-04-07 Thread adam li
Thanks for the reply. I tried to set CONFIG_XENO_OPT_TIMING_SCHEDLAT=1 and run the test in Mode 2 again: # ./latency -t2 -h -T30 == Sampling period: 100 us == Test mode: in-kernel timer handler == All results in microseconds warming up... RTT| 00:00:01 (in-kernel timer handler, 100 us