I think that it was always agreed that those asserts should be dealt with,
since that's not the way the rest of the system works. I think that the
original C++ DOM code was inherited with those in there?
--
Dean Roddey
The CIDLib C++ Frameworks
Charmed Quark Software
[EMAI
Aren't there anyone who would like to comment on this issue ? What are the
thoughts on asserts vs exceptions in Xerces for example ?
Ivan
-Original Message-
From: Uthus Ivan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26. mars 2001 10:54
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: asserts in Xerces
Hi!
We
I am trying to pull together updates for the BCB4 files in CVS and create a
similar BCB5 tree for C++Builder 5 and I would like the community's input on a
few issues...
1. Am I correct that Visual C++ 6 does not declare the C++ standard type
"wchar_t" as intrinsic like C++Builder does, which a
Has anything been done with Andy Heninger's new DOM since his message on 1 March (see
http://www.apache.org/~andyh/).
By the way, will the mailing list archives ever been extended into 2001?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PRO
Depends on who 'we' is. Xerces is not intended to be light weight in
general, but to be general purpose. A really light weight parser would
probably want to cheat and not necessarily follow the spec so fully, for
those folks who know that they will not be using certain features. There are
probably
do we have some c++ based light weight parser which is real fast
in well foremd only mode ??
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks Dean
-Original Message-
From: Dean Roddey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 4:57 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: faster parsing in well formed only mode !!
If you aren't validating, then a significant amount of work isn't done that
otherwise would b
If you aren't validating, then a significant amount of work isn't done that
otherwise would be. Though we took pains to make validation as light weight
as possible, its still a reasonable amount of work, according to how complex
your content models are. We have specialized content models for thing
Hi,
I belive that if we use Xecres parser to parse a well formed XML document
only ( no validations againat DTD/Schema), then parsing time reduces
considerably.
does any one hear support my thought ??
has any one ever done perofrmance comparsion for xerces parser in well
formed Vs valid modes
Thanks that's what I need, I appreciate all the help.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 11:45 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Parser problem
>
>
> Hi, Brian,
>
> Please try this.
>
> DOM_Nod
OK, now I'm confused. The web page says
"Initial support for XML Schema (draft W3C standard)
is also provided."
under the xerces section. It does not qualify this
as applying to xerces-j only. I wish I'd known this...
-Pete
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[
You're mixing C++ run-time libraries. Read the FAQ for more information.
Dave
SCHIEFERT Manfred -
Yes, partial support should be available before summer. Stay tuned.
Tinny
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
We are a medical device manufacturer and we are examining the
possibility of using XML documents to store aspects of our
studies( we make a non-contact heart mapping system,
Endocardial Solutions, Inc. ). I began by experimenting
with DTD's. However, there doesn't seem to be any
Every element has a date and time attribute. I want to get only the
elements that have certain timestamps, say only those after 03/01/2001.
How can I select based on attribute or do I have to get them all and
then look at the attributes and select based on the criteria?
thanks...charlie
They're exposed in SAX2, but not in SAX1. This question is about the SAX1
parser, so comments are not available. To get them, you have to install a
Xerces-specific handler.
Dave
You're probably mixing debug and retail DLL versions. See
http://xml.apache.org/xerces-c/faq-parse.html#faq-23.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, Brian,
Please try this.
DOM_NodeList nodeList = doc.getElementsByTagName("HostName"); // Not
"Server"
for( unsigned int i=0; i on 03/27/2001 11:05:21
AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: RE: Parser problem
Pei
Hello!
I got xerces_c_1_2d.dll via a distribution of Speechworks/CMU open voice browser
(OpenVXI). This included links to Xerces and other PD SW (e.g. SpyderMonkey).
The Xerces delivery was a binary one, I did not get any sources (but lots of samples,
though). My OS is NT 4 SP6.
Running a DOM
>do we have any tool at first place which generates XML documents on the
fly??
Have your program build a DOM tree, or generate a stream of SAX events, and
route that into the sort of output formatters used in the DOMPrint/SAXPrint
examples if you want it output in XML syntax. (You could also jus
Peiyongz,
When I tried to get the child node of the values in the node list I received
an error.
That should be the parent node, which is the nodelist?? (i.e.
parent.getFirstChild())
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001
Hi, Brian,
Is the ###doc### a typo?
for(DOM_Node child=doc.getFirstChild(); child!=NULL;
child=child.getNextSibling() )
{
if (child.getNodeType()== DOM_Node::ELEMENT_NODE)
{
int chTypeNode = child.getNodeType();
DOMString chNodeName = child.getNodeName();
Hello all,
I am having no luck getting values from the children nodes. Any suggestions
on what to do?
here is a code subset of what I did...
DOM_Document doc = parser->getDocument();
DOM_NodeList nodeList = doc.getElementsByTagName("Server");
for(DOM_Node child=d
And for completeness sake, to answer your 3rd question, the Unicode spec
tries to be as all-encompassing as possible with it's encoding.
New characters are always being introduced into it, but they tend to be
of the more obscure variety. I reckon you'll never need a character that
isn't in the uni
24 matches
Mail list logo
