If it includes any other headers, then its probably getting it from those.
We never really made it a major goal that every header would compile
standalone, so its quite possible that some headers, used in some ways,
might require other includes.
--
Dean Roddey
The CIDLib C
Hey All,
When I was going through the SAX API for Xerces-Perl, I noticed that
all the other headers had '#include ', except
DTDHandler.hpp. This seems like an oversight.
jas.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For addi
what does errReporter point to?
-Original Message-
From: Xiaobing Wu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2001 4:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: seg fault with DOMParser::parse
I run a simple experimental DOM parser program under
linux with xerces-c1_4. There's no pro
Given that 99.% of the code that runs in your program is inside the
parse() method, that still leaves a lot of territory to cover. If its your
own build, I'd suggest that you work the problem with the debugger and see
what you can figure out.
--
Dean Roddey
The CIDLib
I run a simple experimental DOM parser program under
linux with xerces-c1_4. There's no problem with
compiling, but when I run the program, it finishes up
with seg fault and no other error information. I used
GDB to debug the program, and found the bug lies in
the parse function.
The code of the
Hello Joannes,
Thank you for your interest in getting Xerces 1.4 to compile with the Mac OS
X command line tools. I've looked at your changes, and believe they can be
integrated with little effort.
Your changes are in two areas:
(a) Updates to the Mac-specific code to support the Mac OS X fina
If you do a progressive parse, and stop before the end, it will remain open
until you call the reset method. If you do a regular parse, or a progressive
parse that successfully goes all the way to the end, it flushes all entities
on the way out, which will close the file.
After I parse the source file, is the file still open?
I'm trying to rename it for archive and I get an errno of 13 (EACCES).
thanks...charlie
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL P
> Are you transcoding any data out of the SAX events? If so, are you deleting
> the returned text?
In other words, you agree with my thinking that progressive
parsing doesn't keep eating memory and, therefore, the problem
is in my code somewhere, which is fair enough. :)
I believe that yes, I am
Are you transcoding any data out of the SAX events? If so, are you deleting
the returned text?
--
Dean Roddey
The CIDLib C++ Frameworks
Charmed Quark Software
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.charmedquark.com
"Why put off until tomorrow what you can
put off until the day afte
Hello,
I am using progressive sax parser to parse an incoming and potentially
very long tcp stream (with my own input source class).
In pseudo code this would look like this, of course:
parser.parseFirst (input_source, token)
while (! end of stream) {
if (! pars
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1345
*** shadow/1345 Mon Apr 16 12:13:42 2001
--- shadow/1345.tmp.5842Mon Apr 16 12:13:42 2001
***
*** 0
--- 1,233
+ ++
+ | BinHTTPURLInputSt
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1262
*** shadow/1262 Mon Apr 9 07:03:14 2001
--- shadow/1262.tmp.4087Mon Apr 16 11:23:00 2001
***
*** 2,9
| Can't delete the pointer returned by DOMString::transcode()|
+---
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1327
*** shadow/1327 Thu Apr 12 13:38:31 2001
--- shadow/1327.tmp.3708Mon Apr 16 11:09:57 2001
***
*** 18,21
content the parser does not throw an exception. It crashes. In debug mode
VisualStudio 6.0 give me some more
Correct, the object "row" is going out of scope almost immediately after
this call. I've tried setting it to NULL and that doesn't change behavior.
I've also added a line to set the clone object to NULL, again with no
changes to the leak.
I'm using Xerces-C 1.4.0.
Thanks
-Evan
-Original Me
15 matches
Mail list logo