OK
Chohan
>From: "Peter A. Volchek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: "Xerces" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Test
>Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 14:43:22 +0300
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Received: from [64.208.42.41] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id
>MHotMailBCA81AEA4004372240D02A2
When using SAX, Use the Locator interface to get the "line number" when
needed.
Alfredo
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Jueves, 19 de Abril de 2001 06:43 p.m.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Question
SAXParseException gives the offending
SAXParseException gives the offending line number, which it must have
gotten from somewhere. Trace the code.
Mark Collette
On Fri, 20 Apr 2001, Pete Black wrote:
> Valid XML could be supplied as a multi-line file, or on one single line.
> The parser likely doesn't keep track of line numbers,
Valid XML could be supplied as a multi-line file, or on one single line.
The parser likely doesn't keep track of line numbers, and you may have
to perform a separate pass through the file, line by line doing a
substring compare till you find the start tag.
> Hello.
>
> We use your parser for
If you use an event API (either SAX or the internal event API), then you can
get line number information. If you use DOM, then the whole file has already
been parsed by the time you see it. Unless the DOM saves that information
for you (and probably it doesn't), then you can't really get it. If yo
Title: Deleting char* returned from DOMString.transcode() in VC++ 6.0
select "Debug Multithreaded DLL".
She would be referring to the multi-threaded C
run-time (CRT) libraries.
In Visual Studio 6 this is configured
in...
Project > Settings > C/C++ > Category :
Code Generation
From there, under "Use run-time library", you can
choose a multithreaded lib. appropriate for your needs ( Debug/Re
Title: Deleting char* returned from DOMString.transcode() in VC++ 6.0
Jesse;
This
brings up a good question - Xerces' debug version generates a .dll and a .lib
but in the
VC++ "Setting options C/C++ tab;
Code Generation; Use run-time library option" I
selected
"Debu
Title: Deleting char* returned from DOMString.transcode() in VC++ 6.0
To Dave and
Jesse;
Just
another caviot to this ongoing sogga -
the
comment inside of dbgheap.c where the Assertion fails says the
following:
/* * If this ASSERT fails,
a
Title: Deleting char* returned from DOMString.transcode() in VC++ 6.0
Dave;
I
recompiled and linked using your suggestion, i.e. delete
[] Name; and I get the same error message.
Thanks anyway.
Gary
-Original Message-From: Dave Connet
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
Title: Deleting char* returned from DOMString.transcode() in VC++ 6.0
In
addition to Jesse's reply to this message, you should use:
delete [] Name;
Dave
Connet
-Original Message-From: Gary
Marsh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 12:29
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECT
For many applications where you're defining a structured language to define
data, XML is a great choice for the following reasons:
Hierarchy Most data is organized according to a hierarchy. Why not
utilize
a data definition language that supports this?
XSLTThi
Title: Deleting char* returned from DOMString.transcode() in VC++ 6.0
I guess the FAQ
could say a little more about this. You need to make sure that you are using the
multithreaded DLL version of the C runtime library. There's considerable
discussion of this in the archives at http://marc.the
Title: Deleting char* returned from DOMString.transcode() in VC++ 6.0
You
are mixing runtimes. Read the FAQ which covers this topic.
-- Dean Roddey Software Geek
Extraordinaire Portal, Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-From: Gary Marsh
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Title: Deleting char* returned from DOMString.transcode() in VC++ 6.0
Jesse;
Thanks
for the tip. I am linking to the xerces_c_1D.lib and I have the
xerces_c_1_4D.dll in my path. Upon recompile/link of
my
program I got the following error message during the
run:
Debug Assertion
Fa
Title: Deleting char* returned from DOMString.transcode() in VC++ 6.0
See http://xml.apache.org/xerces-c/faq-parse.html#faq-23
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1402
*** shadow/1402 Thu Apr 19 11:31:07 2001
--- shadow/1402.tmp.29937 Thu Apr 19 11:31:07 2001
***
*** 0
--- 1,28
+ ++
+ | XMLPlatformUtils::
Title: Deleting char* returned from DOMString.transcode() in VC++ 6.0
Hi,
I am experiencing a problem deleting character pointers that
are returned from the xerces library class DOMString via the
transcode() function. The exact error message from the debugger
is a little bit convoluted du
>getNextSibling(),
In your example you want getFirstChild()
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The xerces behaviour - at least it?s worked in this way for me - is that a
broken validation
constraint IS reported and resolved by the error() Handler interface method,
BUT if you Do nothing in the error() Handler then the parser EXIT.
If you want the parser to continue AFTER a broken validation
Long
ago I proposed that we be able to allow the application to install a transcoder.
There are some gotchas involved, but the flexibility would be very nice.
Basically, we could change the platform init code to only install one if the
pointer isn't already set. If the app sets the static fg
You should be doing a getFirstChild() for the element1 node, then a
getNodeValue() on the child. The text is a child of the element1 node, not
a sibling.
-Original Message-
From: bertrai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 1:31 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Pr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Dear all.
>
> If this is the wrong place to post this, I would appreciate if you could
> point me in the right direction.
>
> I would like to do something like this:
>
> #include // <-- offending part
> // Include Xerces stuff
I have run to the similar problem. I
Dear all.
If this is the wrong place to post this, I would appreciate if you could
point me in the right direction.
I would like to do something like this:
#include // <-- offending part
// Include Xerces stuff
DOMString dStr;
// set value of DOMString
string str = dStr.transc
I am using Xerces-c whith Microsoft Visual C++ 6.0 and I am not able to
retrieve the nodeValue for a Node, which type is TEXT_NODE, after parsing
an xml file.
Here is an exemple:
a line of the xml file is: Element1
If the current node is the Node and then I do
getNextNextSibling(), I have got
You should call getFirstChild() rather then
getNextNextSibling()
- Original Message -
From:
bertrai
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 11:30
AM
Subject: Problem with retrieving the
value of a Node which type is TEXT_NODE
I am using Xerces
Hello.
We use your parser for the processing of the XML files. But we have a problem.
It is necessary to define the line number of start-tag in the XML file during
the processing.
We don't know how do it. Can you help us?
Best regards.
Vasura Oleg.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1395
*** shadow/1395 Thu Apr 19 07:23:24 2001
--- shadow/1395.tmp.28522 Thu Apr 19 07:23:24 2001
***
*** 0
--- 1,30
+ ++
+ | DOM_NamedNodeMap::
You can use an EntityResolver to redirect the dtd to a dummy dtd. For an
example on how to use an entity resolver, see the sample "Redirect".
Tinny
Alexey Miroshnichenko wrote:
> Hello Tinny,
>
> Thanks for your answer especially for part II. But can I ask you more?
>
> If I have only xml file
Ah this reminds me of a bug/feature which I noticed recently: when I feed
the parser (DOM) an UTF-16 document which is actually lets say ASCII or
ISO-8859-1 (i.e. no 16 bit) it will core dump.
In other words: if the < ... ENCODING= > part _says_ its in UTF-16 but in
fact it is not, then we are i
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1393
*** shadow/1393 Thu Apr 19 06:50:42 2001
--- shadow/1393.tmp.28419 Thu Apr 19 06:50:42 2001
***
*** 0
--- 1,19
+ ++
+ | Converting from Un
To get details of why a parse failed, you have to write and plug in an
error handler object. The default handler just fails silently.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hello All,
Can anyone answer for follow questions.
What is the error? And What is Eatal Error? When we about parsing.
Why parser do fatal error when it meets validation error?
I had never get error from parser. Only fatal one.
So, what's the difference?
Thanks before
--
Best regar
Hello All,
Can you ask me follow questions.
What is the error? And What is Eatal Error? When we about parsing.
Why parser do fatal error when it meets validation error?
I had never get error from parser. Only fatal one.
So, what's the difference?
Thanks before
--
Best regards,
Al
Hello Tinny,
Thanks for your answer especially for part II. But can I ask you more?
If I have only xml files and my objective is only test them for be
well-formed. Some files have doctype decl some haven't. I must do only
this test. And in general case I have no dtd file. How can I be equal
to a
Use XML where it's a useful notation. It may be useful because you're
exchanging data with other folks -- OR because you or your users may want
to leverage XML-based tools and APIs within your own organization.
Note that another option is to store the data in non-XML form for most
purposes, and
Modifying the DOM only modifies the in-memory copy of the document. To
generate new file content, you have to serialize the DOM's contents out to
that file.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e
Hi,
The time to move to new Xerces has come to our
project.
Since many time has passed since our last discussions, I would
like to ask some questions to see if smth. was implemented/not
implemented
1. Did you implemented (or are planning to implememnt) the
third party transcoders support
I dont delete anything, since DOM_XXX are references (smartpointers), and
setting the reference to NULL should delete all the data (according to
previous mails from Dean Roddey, if I remember correctly). But our
experience is that the memory usage is continually increasing.
Ivan
-Original M
Test
Thanks Erik
vikas
- Original Message -
From: "Erik Rydgren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 2:54 PM
Subject: RE: Do we need XML always
> Of course not. No one is forced to use XML.
> But it is still recomended to use a standard data format as
Of course not. No one is forced to use XML.
But it is still recomended to use a standard data format as a transport
protocol.
The need to interact with other applications maybe isn't neccesary today but
I promise
you that if you dont prepare for it then it definately is required tomorrow
or more p
Hi again!
Sorry about my ignorance, but Linda Derezinski encouraged me
to check that I am linking with multithreaded runtime (thank
you, Linda).
But I do not know to check this. I am linking with
'xerces-c_1.lib'...
I have to say that I am also working with another library
.lib at the same time
Thank you.
Your assistance has really helped me.
Regards.
Ideshini.
-Original Message-
From: Bill Schindler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 April 2001 20:49
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Extracting structure's as char*
On Wednesday, April 18, 2001, at 10:43 AM, Ideshini Naido
Hi everyone
I went thru the FAQ but unable to get my reply.
I am new to XML. I have an application which is a web based solution for
keeping a record of production and sales for one organization only.
Do I need to use XML, since I am not interacting with any other
organization. I am using JSP,Se
Hi!
Working with VC++6.0 (+Visual Studio SP5) on WinNT4.0
(+SP6b)
When I was working WITHOUT Visual Studio Service Pack 5:
+ If I inserted a lot of 'strcpy(data1, data2)', I compiled
without any problems, but I got the message "Debug
Assertion
Failed - File dbgde
Hi ALL
I am new to XML and i am trying to create a simple element using the DOM.
My problem is that no data is stored in the xml file.
Following is my code.
import java.io.*;
import org.w3c.dom.*;
import com.ibm.xml.parsers.*;
import javax.xml.parsers.DocumentBuilderFactory;
import javax.xml.p
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1387
*** shadow/1387 Thu Apr 19 01:13:29 2001
--- shadow/1387.tmp.27576 Thu Apr 19 01:13:29 2001
***
*** 0
--- 1,75
+ ++
+ | Null pointer to fI
48 matches
Mail list logo
