"Williamson, Siehnai" wrote:
> First, shouldn't a contradictory encoding be an "error" rather than a mere
> "warning"?
XML Sect. 4.3.3 appears to agree. I don't know if the SAX
specification lightens up on this requirement for any reason.
Although, an "error" (as opposed to a "fatal error") ne
The first node you get is Administrate
then a text node for the carriage return
then the node
then a text node for the carriage return.
if you want to go deep and get the user name an password,
do a recursive function and explore the internal nodes.
note that you should explore each node based
When I am using xerces to parse the following xml docuemnt
user1
user1
I retrieve the node and then the following code
DOM_NodeList operList = adminRequestNode.getChildNodes() ;
for( unsigned int numop = 0; numop < operList.getLength(); numop ++)
{
// Retrieve e
Thanks, this worked. The other linking errors were my own fault
-Julie
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 1:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Linking with Xerces as a static library with VC++?
Julia,
You ma
Hi, Christoffer,
Changes have been made to the /validators/datatype/*DVT.[c|hpp] and
/validators/common/ContentSpecNode.hpp, and shall be available from the
next nightly build, please help verify, thanks.
Regards,
Peiyong Zhang
XML Parsers De
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT
ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW
AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE
DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL
BE LOST SOMEWHERE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2816
Title: contradictory encoding warning creates later error that doesn't get thrown
Hi,
I'm having a problem when there are SAX parser warnings. It appears that processing continues in the case where the encoding scheme mentioned in a document is not its true encoding. The SAX parser does t
I have tried using the latest nightly build, however I am still
experiencing the same problem. I think what I am looking for most is a
clarification as to how the SAX parser is working.
I expect the memory usage to fluctuate as the document is parsed such
that memory gets allocated when an eleme
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT
ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW
AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE
DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL
BE LOST SOMEWHERE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3017
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT
ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW
AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE
DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL
BE LOST SOMEWHERE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2676
This sounds similar to bugzilla bug 1329 which is now fixed in the nightly
build http://xml.apache.org/dist/xerces-c/nightly/.
Tinny
Mark Northcott wrote:
> I am working on a project that is making use of the SAX2XMLReader to
> parse XML documents, and I am noticing that the parser is consuming
I am working on a project that is making use of the SAX2XMLReader to
parse XML documents, and I am noticing that the parser is consuming a
large amount of memory, which steadily increases approximately 200K per
sec. This is a problem for me because the product is expected to parse
very large data
Hi,
We are trying to compile Xerces 1.5.1 src on AIX and have run into some
compilation problems
makefiels generated with:
runConfigure -paix -cxlc -xxlC -rnone
It appears that xlC will not accept that the following construct:
class A {
A *left, *right;
A() {left=0, left=0;};
void
We run Xerces v1.5.0
We are validating a 1600 bytes xml-msg using StdInParse
sample from our schema file:
If maxOccurs is set to 10 we can validate the msg in 100msec
if maxOccurs is set to 1000 it takes 6sek!
if maxOccurs is set to 1 we get a stackoverflow:
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT
ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW
AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE
DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL
BE LOST SOMEWHERE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3170
Dear Tinny
It works perfect :D
Thousand thanks for your help
and also your precious time!!
Wish you all the best
Best regards,
Jordan Cheun Ngen, Chong
Room 4067
Distributed and Embeded Systems Group
Centre for Telematics and Information Technology
16 matches
Mail list logo