PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT
ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW
AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE
DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL
BE LOST SOMEWHERE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3365
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT
ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW
AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE
DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL
BE LOST SOMEWHERE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3364
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT
ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW
AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE
DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL
BE LOST SOMEWHERE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3363
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT
ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW
AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE
DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL
BE LOST SOMEWHERE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3362
"Dean Roddey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If you are going to do the James Clark type tests, you must use a parser
> that does canonical output, are you doing that? You can use the ParserTest
> program, and use the /Canon output flag (I think that's the flag, its been a
> long time since I wrot
"Juergen Hermann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Does anyone have values (number of violations) for the above tests?
>
> URL: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/xml-conformance/xml-test-suite.html
So Juergen,
Do your results match up with mine? Or are you still getting 200+
failures?
Also,
"Dean Roddey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If you are going to do the James Clark type tests, you must use a parser
> that does canonical output, are you doing that? You can use the ParserTest
> program, and use the /Canon output flag (I think that's the flag, its been a
> long time since I wrot
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT
ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW
AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE
DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL
BE LOST SOMEWHERE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3369
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT
ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW
AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE
DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL
BE LOST SOMEWHERE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3369
Sounds like you are calling XMLPlatformUtils::Initialize(), doing the
parsing, then XMLPlatformUtils::Terminate(), over and over again in the same
process.
Don't do that.
See http://xml.apache.org/xerces-c/faq-parse.html#faq-25
! --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2001-09-01
16
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT
ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW
AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE
DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL
BE LOST SOMEWHERE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3369
On Sat, 01 Sep 2001 11:18:02 -0700, Dean Roddey wrote:
>If you are going to do the James Clark type tests, you must use a parser
>that does canonical output, are you doing that?
No, I do not yet do output conformance testing at all. Those test results are purely
based on the parse result (MUST
If you are going to do the James Clark type tests, you must use a parser
that does canonical output, are you doing that? You can use the ParserTest
program, and use the /Canon output flag (I think that's the flag, its been a
long time since I wrote it.) That will generate the correct output to
com
"Jason E. Stewart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Juergen Hermann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Sat, 01 Sep 2001 11:24:40 +0200, Juergen Hermann wrote:
> >
> > >>Two tests in oasis/ fail that should have passed:
> > >>And two tests in oasis/ pass that should have failed:
> > >
> > >Well
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT
ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW
AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE
DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL
BE LOST SOMEWHERE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3369
"Juergen Hermann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, 01 Sep 2001 11:24:40 +0200, Juergen Hermann wrote:
>
> >>Two tests in oasis/ fail that should have passed:
> >>And two tests in oasis/ pass that should have failed:
> >
> >Well, I have 272 failures with strict checking, and that seems a lit
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT
ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW
AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE
DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL
BE LOST SOMEWHERE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3364
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT
ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW
AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE
DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL
BE LOST SOMEWHERE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3365
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT
ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW
AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE
DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL
BE LOST SOMEWHERE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3363
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT
ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW
AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE
DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL
BE LOST SOMEWHERE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3361
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT
ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW
AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE
DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL
BE LOST SOMEWHERE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3362
On Sat, 01 Sep 2001 11:24:40 +0200, Juergen Hermann wrote:
>>Two tests in oasis/ fail that should have passed:
>>And two tests in oasis/ pass that should have failed:
>
>Well, I have 272 failures with strict checking, and that seems a little high
>to me. ;)
It is too high, for example, this tes
On 31 Aug 2001 22:34:29 -0600, Jason E. Stewart wrote:
>"Juergen Hermann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>So far DOMCount -v=auto:
>
>Two tests in oasis/ fail that should have passed:
>And two tests in oasis/ pass that should have failed:
Well, I have 272 failures with strict checking, and that see
23 matches
Mail list logo