Re: SAX performance observations

Thank you Mark (and Dean) for the comments. I used a combination of gprof, commenting out my "do somethings" as you suggest, and making my handlers do nothing at all to determine where the speed problems were. They were primarily in the startElement handler string recognition part. There is

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3831] - Attributes::getValue(XMLCh *qName) throws undocumented exception

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: XML Signature implementation in C++

Our signature code is unfortunately private. We did what we needed and no more, which means it's pretty tightly integrated with the rest of our code, and it's not at all general. Even if I were allowed to send it to you, you'd probably have what you need done faster if you started from scratch. -

RE: XML Signature implementation in C++

Oh ok, is yours available on a web site? Is it a free work? DELGRANCHE David SOGITEC Industries Division Documentation et Systemes 24 avenue Lavoisier BP 7408 35174 BRUZ cedex Tel: 02.99.05.34.25 Fax: 02.99.05.34.05 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Message d'origine- De: Jesse Pelton

RE: XML Signature implementation in C++

Nope, we rolled our own using Microsoft's CryptoAPI before it was available. As you might expect, it was a few months' work. -Original Message- From: David DELGRANCHE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 11:45 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: XML Signature impl

RE: XML Signature implementation in C++

Ok, have you ever use it? DELGRANCHE David SOGITEC Industries Division Documentation et Systemes 24 avenue Lavoisier BP 7408 35174 BRUZ cedex Tel: 02.99.05.34.25 Fax: 02.99.05.34.05 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Message d'origine- De: Jesse Pelton [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Date:

RE: XML Signature implementation in C++

Of the implementations mentioned at http://www.w3.org/Signature/#Code, only Infomosaic's (https://www.infomosaic.net/XMLSign/) appears to be for C/C++. -Original Message- From: David DELGRANCHE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 11:31 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subj

Re: Possible memory leak in IDOM_Element::getElementsByTagName()????

> Does the parser have to remain instantiated to continue using the document that it parsed? That's how the "latest" design is (latest nightly build with latest fixes, not 1.5.1, Xerces-C 1.5.1 has a memory leak bug that the document somehow still alives even the IDOMParser is deleted). Tinny "H

XML Signature implementation in C++

Hi all, I would like to use XML signature recommendation to sign XML documents and then verify this signature. My problem is that I can't find XML signature implementation in C++ that could allow me to verify these signatures. I know that Java API exists but is there on

Re: Next release?

It seems most people like a beta 1.5.2 in Oct, and then 1.6 in Dec. Due to some workload conflict and other build problems, we couldn't do this build in last few weeks. We will try it next week and hopefully we can have an official release 1.5.2 by mid of Oct. Tinny Ng XML Parsers Development I

RE: XercesDef.hpp

Are they blocking you to access other ports then 80 or 21 on remote machines? Why allow you to use http then? It is just as unsafe. You can fetch files through it. No I don't think they block you on port level. I rather beleive you have the standard trouble with firewall and ftp. Set your ftp cli

RE: XercesDef.hpp

Blocking ftp sites is an internal thing. The Army has decided that any ftp site cannot be accessed because of security reasons. I get to the folder, but I am blocked from actually downloading any files. Maureen -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sen