DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6092] - stricmp and strnicmp not present in FreeBSD

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

xercesc on hpux 11 with gcc

I'm trying to compile xercesc 1.6 on HPUX 11 with gcc. After some minor code modification (I had to include stdio.h in a few spots to prevent a size_t error), it compiles and links, but when I try to use it I get messages like these: /usr/lib/dld.sl: Unresolved symbol: _$_t7Janitor1Zt14RefHash

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6407] New: - Multiple ampersands not interpreted correctly

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Sample Code Error

I believe this was discussed quite a while back, and the conclusion was that the following is correct and the simplest: DefaultHandler* defaultHandler= new DefaultHandler(); parser->setContentHandler(defaultHandler); parser->setErrorHandler(default

RE: BSTR

Well, working from limited knowledge of BSTRs, you can assume that it is identical to a wchar_t* and assume that it will be null terminated. In this case you can easily create a DOMString from it as (given our assumption) a BSTR is identical to an XMLCh* on windows platforms. Since you are talking

RE: BSTR

On Tue, 12 Feb 2002, Bavishi, Pankij wrote: > Hello Ellis, > Thanks a lot for a detailed explanation. > Yeah it is very helpful. > But right now on practical grounds, I need to know how I can convert the > BSTR data into something that Xerces-C++ can understand. > Right now I am only aware of

RE: BSTR

Title: Re: BSTR Hello Ellis, Thanks a lot for a detailed explanation. Yeah it is very helpful. But right now on practical grounds, I need to know how I can convert the BSTR data into something that Xerces-C++ can understand. Right now I am only aware of something like DOMString. Do y

Sample Code Error

Hi, I believe the code sample at the following location http://xml.apache.org/xerces-c/program.html Under the heading -> SAX2 Programming Guide Constructing an XML Reader Is incorrect. The section that reads -> ContentHandler* contentHandler = new DefaultHandler();

Re: BSTR

Title: Re: BSTR Pankij, The previous replies to your question did not really explain why BSTR and DomString are not compatible.  I hope this helps you to understand why: The only difference between a Unicode BSTR and an ordinary LPWSTR is that the memory allocated to the BSTR includes the

Xerces and BCB

I've sent updates to Tinny for the lastest changes to the BCB project. The project file now supports the sane-includes changes. Unlike my previous updates, this one has added a BCB6 project. I will no longer be maintaining the BCB5 stuff. In case you are not aware, Borland has started ship

Re: Schema Validator broken?

At 11.06 12/02/2002 -0800, you wrote: >If you turn off validation (valScheme==Never), then all elements are just >marked as declared for ease of processing. Since if validation is off, the >parser does not really care if the element is defined in the grammar or >not, so >for performance reason,

Re: Schema Validator broken?

If you turn off validation (valScheme==Never), then all elements are just marked as declared for ease of processing. Since if validation is off, the parser does not really care if the element is defined in the grammar or not, so for performance reason, all elements are just marked as "Declared".

Re: Schema Validator broken?

At 10.47 12/02/2002 -0800, you wrote: >The ElementDecl pool from the validator is a collection of all the >elements appear in the grammar, and in the XML document. > >Each element has a "CreateReason", if this element has a corresponding >definition in the grammar, then the "CreateReason" == Dec

Schema content model

Title: Schema content model Hi, While running the SEnumVal example using the personal-schema.xml file, I realized that getFormattedContentModel() returns nothing when the complex type for the element equals "All" (see element "name" in personal-schemal.xml).  After further research, it appea

RE: Schema Validator broken?

Title: RE: Schema Validator broken? Thanks! -Original Message- From:   Tinny Ng [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:   Tuesday, February 12, 2002 12:47 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:    Re: Schema Validator broken? The ElementDecl pool from the validator is a collection of all

Re: Schema Validator broken?

The ElementDecl pool from the validator is a collection of all the elements appear in the grammar, and in the XML document. Each element has a "CreateReason", if this element has a corresponding definition in the grammar, then the "CreateReason" == Declared.  If this element only appears in the D

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6404] New: - schemaLocation - specification of reference to local file is dereferenced incorrectly

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6367] - memory leak parsing xml document

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6367] - memory leak parsing xml document

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Schema Validator broken?

Title: Schema Validator broken? Hi, Why does SchemaElementDecl in SEnumVal example contain elements from the XML document even if it is not in the schema?  Shouldn't it only contain those elements or values that are listed in the schema? I have a dummy xml document with a root element call

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6367] - memory leak parsing xml document

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: xerces-c-1.7?

I like this idea, but at the very least perhaps we could have a page with links on off http://xml.apache.org/xerces-c/index.html. This would probably be quicker in setting up and I'm sure would help a lot of people. Gareth On Mon, 11 Feb 2002, Radovan Chytracek wrote: > May be it's the rig

RE: xerces-c-1.7?

On Mon, 11 Feb 2002, Joseph Kesselman/CAM/Lotus wrote: > > >but DOM3 *is* the standard interface. It's the w3c rec and it's what > >xerces-j 2.0 uses. > > DOM3 is _NOT_ a standard yet. It's a Working Draft, not a RECcomendation. > That means it's still subject to change. > > However, there's n

LotusScript Binding

Hello, is there any interest and/or need for a LotusScript binding of Xerces-C? Yes, I know, it should be possible to use Xerces-C over the COM-Objects, but I think a LSX of wrapper-classes should be faster? If there is already a binding, please notify me -- I didn't find anything. Greets, CK