Re: Subelements ordering.

The parser maintains child order, but not necessarily attribute order. -- Dean Roddey The Charmed Quark Controller Charmed Quark Software [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.charmedquark.com "If it don't have a control port, don't buy it!" - Original Message - From: "L

Re: Subelements ordering.

I hope so. For example, the element in MathML takes two numbers () as children, and I would assume the lower comes before the higher... I think ordering matters in xml. Am I wrong? On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Renji Panicker wrote: > Hi, > I remember reading somewhere that DOM does not guarantee that

Subelements ordering.

Hi, I remember reading somewhere that DOM does not guarantee that the order in which the children of an element are returned is the same as that in which it is stored in the XML file. But I have noticed xerces does maintain this order. Is this by design? Or more to the point, is this behaviour de

what problem in compiling Xerces on UnixWare? Undefined symbol :ValueVectorOf::ValueVectorOf(unsigned int) [with T1=bool] libxerces-c1_6_0.so

Hi Jorge Pozo Ramirez£¬ Thanks for your help.Now i have finished the compilering of Xerces-C 1_6_0.But when i test this lib,i met a very strange problem.as follows: Undefined first referenced symbol in file ValueVectorOf::ValueVectorOf(unsigned

RE: Xerces 1.6.0 and RH linux 7.1

I don't know if this is helpful. I had problems with xerces on RH 7.1 because of C++ exception handling across shared libraries. I upgraded to 7.2 and am using g++ version 3 and the problems are gone. -Original Message- From: Bhushan Khanal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, Februar

RE: Xerces 1.6.0 and RH linux 7.1

With redhat 7.1 there are some problems with exception handling when C++ code is dynamically loaded into non C++ programs. It might be worth checking to see if you are running into this problem. Look at bug #37933. http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHBA-2001-121.html Bhushan -Original M

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6672] New: - SAXValidator results in an access violation when validating against schema with empty element that has default value

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Getting error on valid xml doc

Title: RE: Getting error on valid xml doc It appears to be at the .  Here's the actual document I used. <>   -Original Message- From:   Dean Roddey [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:   Monday, February 25, 2002 5:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:    Re: Getting error

Re: Getting error on valid xml doc

Title: RE: Getting error on valid xml doc Could you indicate where that is exactly? Your posted version had no line breaks in it. --Dean RoddeyThe Charmed Quark ControllerCharmed Quark Software[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.charmedquark.com   "If it don't have a control po

RE: Getting error on valid xml doc

Title: RE: Getting error on valid xml doc Line number 5, column 9. -Original Message- From:   Dean Roddey [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:   Monday, February 25, 2002 5:43 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:    Re: Getting error on valid xml doc What line number is it reporting

Re: Getting error on valid xml doc

Title: Getting error on valid xml doc What line number is it reporting the error at?   --Dean RoddeyThe Charmed Quark ControllerCharmed Quark Software[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.charmedquark.com   "If it don't have a control port, don't buy it!"     - Original M

Getting error on valid xml doc

Title: Getting error on valid xml doc Hi, I keep getting the error, "Unknown element 'XMLGUI'", when I parse the xml document below.  It doesn't have a corresponding DTD or schema, so what is Xerces checking the document against?  The document is below. <>            Anything insi

How to get at ||

I see someone else posted this question last month without getting an answer. I would also like to know how to get at the annotation field and specifically, the appinfo. I need to associate some data in the schema with an element so that my program can retrieve it. The annotation element seems

Re: Xerces 1.6.0 and RH linux 7.1

I downloaded the precompiled libs but got segfaults. Then I just recompiled them from source and everything seems to be fine... On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Guy Pazi wrote: > Hi, > I've seen lots of questions regarding segmentation faults when running > Xerces 1.6.0 over RH linux 7.1 and a bug report (3

How to parse schema tree? SchemaGrammar limitations.

Using the SchemaGrammar class we can enumerate the elements in the tree, but is there any way to make a tree structure representing the schema? SchemaGrammar seems like the best class to do it but it has the following limitations: 1) If ContentType == All, then Content Model is empty. 2) The fE

Xerces 1.6.0 and RH linux 7.1

Hi, I've seen lots of questions regarding segmentation faults when running Xerces 1.6.0 over RH linux 7.1 and a bug report (3771) of the issue, but couldn't yet find an answer. Is there a Xerces version currently running over RH linux 7.1?   Thanks Guy

Xerces-C++ on VXWorks

Hello all, Is there any implementation of the Xerces-C++ library for the VXWorks operating system ? I have started to port the library on VXWorks but I met a strange compilation error ("abnormal program termination, compiler error"). I am using the last version of Xerces-C++, a

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6637] - full paths don't work for -c, -x in runConfigure

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Bug report for Xerces-C++ [2002/02/25]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I wonder what happened to the bugs from last year. Are they still > open? Yes, they were all on the list. They stay on the active bug list until someone closes them. jas. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [

Re: Bug in the file src/util/Platforms/IRIX/IRIXPlatformUtils.cpp

I think this is fixed already in Xerces-C++ 1.6.0. Please verify. Tinny - Original Message - From: "Michael Macaluso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 9:01 AM Subject: Bug in the file src/util/Platforms/IRIX/IRIXPlatformUtils.cpp > Backgro

Bug in the file src/util/Platforms/IRIX/IRIXPlatformUtils.cpp

Background: Compiling with GCC 3.0.1 on IRIX 6.5.13. I have used the following for the call to runConfigure: runConfigure -pirix -cgcc -xg++ -minmem -nsocket -tnative -rpthread -d Summary: Near line 550. The declaration of the type "static XMLMutex atomicOpsMutex" is placed just above

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6581] - file "xerces-c1_6_0.tar.gz" corrupt ?

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Bug report for Xerces-C++ [2002/02/25]

If they're listed, they're open. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 9:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug report for Xerces-C++ [2002/02/25] Hello, I wonder what happened to the bugs from last year. Are they st

Re: Bug report for Xerces-C++ [2002/02/25]

Hello, I wonder what happened to the bugs from last year. Are they still open? Adib. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > +---+ > | Bugzilla Bug ID | > | +

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6581] - file "xerces-c1_6_0.tar.gz" corrupt ?

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: using for schema validation with xerces 1.6

By default the attribute 'processContents' for is 'strict' which means there must be a top-level declaration for the item available: processContents = (lax | skip | strict) : strict So if the element is not declared anywhere, then the parser will issue an error saying 'not found'. If you

Bug report for Xerces-C++ [2002/02/25]

+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned